If you have children, did you get a push present? What do you think about the concept of push presents? Yay or nay?
I googled it and it seems there are fiery opinions on both sides.
In my opinion, there's a strain of misogyny in the "no way!' camp. People don't earn Christmas and birthday presents, but they get them anyway, and I think that a woman who has had a baby has earned much more appreciation than most people who get Christmas gifts! Today, many people have more disposable income than ever, and if someone can afford a gesture of appreciation, even if small, I think that it's a tender and kind thing to have all the efforts of pregnancy, birth, and recovery acknowledged. There seems something woman-hating in the vehemently-against opinion. This woman just went through a complete physical sh&t-show, and you have the money to get her something nice to say thank-you, and you just....don't? Meanwhile she's dealing with vaginal stitches, a body that's changed forever, lack of sleep, and sore, leaky breasts? C'mon.
The whole "baby is the present" thing just reeks to me of a "women should put up and shut up" line of thinking. If I was the partner of a woman who had had a baby, and if I could afford, it, I couldn't imagine not getting her a super-pretty necklace or something. It doesn't have to be expensive. Angara has gorgeous gemstone solitaire pendants for $200-$500. (I've dealt with Angara a lot recently and have nothing but good things to say about them.) In fact, if I could afford something nice like that, not super-expensive, and I chose not to get it for someone who's in the hospital because they took one for the team, I'd feel pretty unkind. (It's worth noting that one of my love languages is gifts, though, and of course, I'm a PSer!)
It's important to note that in the scenario I'm describing above, the non-birthing partner can easily afford a token. It's different if a couple are financially stretched.
I googled it and it seems there are fiery opinions on both sides.
In my opinion, there's a strain of misogyny in the "no way!' camp. People don't earn Christmas and birthday presents, but they get them anyway, and I think that a woman who has had a baby has earned much more appreciation than most people who get Christmas gifts! Today, many people have more disposable income than ever, and if someone can afford a gesture of appreciation, even if small, I think that it's a tender and kind thing to have all the efforts of pregnancy, birth, and recovery acknowledged. There seems something woman-hating in the vehemently-against opinion. This woman just went through a complete physical sh&t-show, and you have the money to get her something nice to say thank-you, and you just....don't? Meanwhile she's dealing with vaginal stitches, a body that's changed forever, lack of sleep, and sore, leaky breasts? C'mon.
The whole "baby is the present" thing just reeks to me of a "women should put up and shut up" line of thinking. If I was the partner of a woman who had had a baby, and if I could afford, it, I couldn't imagine not getting her a super-pretty necklace or something. It doesn't have to be expensive. Angara has gorgeous gemstone solitaire pendants for $200-$500. (I've dealt with Angara a lot recently and have nothing but good things to say about them.) In fact, if I could afford something nice like that, not super-expensive, and I chose not to get it for someone who's in the hospital because they took one for the team, I'd feel pretty unkind. (It's worth noting that one of my love languages is gifts, though, and of course, I'm a PSer!)
It's important to note that in the scenario I'm describing above, the non-birthing partner can easily afford a token. It's different if a couple are financially stretched.