shape
carat
color
clarity

ERD cushion with pear sidestones, a la Leon Mege

Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.

Miranda

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Feb 18, 2006
Messages
4,101
I like the .96s too! I tend to like larger sidestones, though. The .8s look too small to me and the 1.0s look funny, could be the pic.

Your cushion is gorgeous! I can''t wait for the finished product!
 

*sparkle*

Rough_Rock
Joined
Mar 25, 2008
Messages
40
Thanks, emilina22! I can''t wait to see the stones set. Only 8 weeks and counting...!
 

*sparkle*

Rough_Rock
Joined
Mar 25, 2008
Messages
40
Gosh thanks a bunch, mooscushion! The GIA cert says that it''s a cushion brilliant with 8 pavillion mains. Best of luck with your cushion search! It''s fun because every cushion is a little different. I''m sure that you''re going to end up with a stunner!!!
 

*sparkle*

Rough_Rock
Joined
Mar 25, 2008
Messages
40
Thanks, Miranda! The 0.96ers definitely seem to have the popular vote here! I''ll see what Leon says tomorrow--I''m gonna call him first thing in the morning!
1.gif
 

gemgirl

Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Feb 8, 2003
Messages
5,565
I like the .86 ctw. I think they''ll make your center stone look larger.
 

peppermintpatty

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
May 15, 2008
Messages
1,301
I like the first set, unless you are going to lose too much of the stone size when they are recut. That is a gorgeous cushion!!!!! Your ring is going to be beautiful and I can''t wait to see pictures of it when it is done!!!!
 

Shay37

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Mar 1, 2004
Messages
3,343
Date: 6/26/2008 7:46:26 PM
Author: jarbatz
WOW! That cushion is stunning. There is something about the .96 pears that I am drawn to but really any of those sidestone will look fantastic! Can''t wait to see the finished product!
I think it''s the cut on them, but I heavily ditto this. I really LOVE those .96ers. Good luck on your choice. Your stone looks gorjamoussessse too.
2.gif
3.gif


shay
 

angeline

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Jul 23, 2006
Messages
2,367
I vote the first pair, the smallest. They don''t look small by any means and they allow the center to shine.
 

*sparkle*

Rough_Rock
Joined
Mar 25, 2008
Messages
40
Thank you for your responses, gemgirl, peppermintpatty, Shay37, and angeline! I think it''s still pretty much a toss up between the 0.80''s and the 0.96''s. Based on the pictures alone, I like the 0.96''s a tad better, but I''ll see if Leon has a strong preference for one or the other based on my finger size. Will let you guys know what he says!
 

honey22

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Jul 28, 2007
Messages
4,458
I am not sure whether it''s just the picture or the lighting or whatever, but I am also drawn to the 0.96ctw set - the ring is going to look stunning!

Just out of curiosity, why would having strong blue fluoro mean it won''t work with in a three stone ring?
 

scarlet16

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Mar 14, 2006
Messages
960
LOVE LOVE LOVE the second pair (.96). They are nice and fat which meshes so well with your rounded cushion.

What was Leon''s favorite set?

Also, Mark is fantastic!!! That stone is incredible.
 

Diamond*Dana

Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Jul 21, 2006
Messages
7,341
My favorite combo is the .96. Very pretty stones
30.gif
 

Ellen

Super_Ideal_Rock
Joined
Jan 13, 2006
Messages
24,433
Another vote for the .96''rs. That ring is going to be gorgeous!
 

NeverEndingUpgrade

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Oct 3, 2007
Messages
1,823
Date: 6/26/2008 7:51:57 PM
Author: *sparkle*
Thanks for your reply, jarbatz! I agree, I''m drawn to the 0.96 ct combo the most too, but I can''t tell if I''m just being swayed by the lighting in the picture. It''s hard to focus on the proportions alone, you know?!? I wonder if the 0.80 ct combo might be a more delicate look...
I was going to say that. I personally like the smaller sides because I think they highlight the cushion more. And that is one fabulous cushion!
 

julesbeth

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Jan 10, 2008
Messages
737
*Sparkle* What a predicament you are in, poor girl!!! ;-)


Your ring is going to be just stunning no matter what sidestone size you pick! BUT I will throw in my 2 cents, and say that I like the .80 the best.
 

LaurenThePartier

Super_Ideal_Rock
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
10,100
I have to go with the .96 ct. pair too. The faceting is gorgeous with your lovely cushion.

I can''t wait to see the finished product!
 

NewEnglandLady

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Jul 27, 2007
Messages
6,299
All of the options look so wonderful! My first preference was the .96 pair of pears :), but I think it might be because of the lighting and the facets on the pears look nice and chunky? I wonder if the .80 pair would look better once set. Agh, I''m no help, but just wanted to say the cushion is absolutely lovely and I looooove pear side stones.
 

gwendolyn

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Aug 4, 2007
Messages
6,770
I think with your ring size, I''d choose the smallest ones, since your center stone looks like it will take up a large chunk of your finger anyway AND the pears will be set length-wise. It will be a beautiful ring! Can''t wait to see it when it''s done!
1.gif
 

Fly Girl

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Jan 9, 2007
Messages
7,312
The .96s as well. I think they have a chunky looking cut that picks up on the cut of the center stone. The larger pair looks too busy (tiny facets/reflections?) to me.
 

surfgirl

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
4,438
I like the cut of the .96s, but I like the ratio of sides to center on the smaller stones, that combo makes your center stone pop way more. The .96 pears look less crushed icey and more chunky facets and that''s what I like about that pair. Can you ask him to look for a smaller pair but with chunkier faceting?
 

Imdanny

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Jan 21, 2008
Messages
6,186
Love the center stone! Wow!
30.gif


You must be so thrilled!
9.gif


I vote for .96
 

anne_h

Brilliant_Rock
Premium
Joined
Jun 13, 2005
Messages
1,046
First off, your cushion is very pretty. I love the culet.

Add my vote to the list for the .96 pear set. There is something about that photo... also, they are chubbier than the other sets, which I think looks awesome!

Anne
 

decodelighted

Super_Ideal_Rock
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
11,534
Date: 6/27/2008 12:41:14 PM
Author: surfgirl
I like the cut of the .96s, but I like the ratio of sides to center on the smaller stones, that combo makes your center stone pop way more. The .96 pears look less crushed icey and more chunky facets and that''s what I like about that pair. Can you ask him to look for a smaller pair but with chunkier faceting?
Ditto this exactly. ESPECIALLY since I''ve seen the cushion on your hand. You teensy fingered minx! The proportions of the smaller pair "work" more for me. I *do* wonder if its just the picture of the .96s being better, cuz I''m drawn to the look of them too.

Curious to see what Leon thinks. If he thinks the cut is really chunkier on the .96 ones, then I''d prolly live with the proportion rather than wait for a new search. They are lovely stones! If the .80 ones are just as lovely & chunky in person (but not showing up in the pix) that would be my 1st choice for sure.

Don''t know what you mean about an airline. Thought only halos had an airline??? *shrug*
 

icekid

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Nov 17, 2004
Messages
7,476
Date: 6/27/2008 12:41:14 PM
Author: surfgirl
I like the cut of the .96s, but I like the ratio of sides to center on the smaller stones, that combo makes your center stone pop way more. The .96 pears look less crushed icey and more chunky facets and that''s what I like about that pair. Can you ask him to look for a smaller pair but with chunkier faceting?
My thoughts exactly too. I really prefer smaller side stones, but in this case the larger seem to have a much nicer cut. Wonder why the pictures aren''t all of the same quality though! Your lovely cushion looks so different in each. Definitely ask Leon for his opinion; he certainly has a knack for choosing side stones.
 

mercoledi

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Jun 20, 2006
Messages
2,822
Another vote for the .96''s. That ring is going to be spectacular, your cushion is a knockout!
 

facetgirl

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Jun 20, 2008
Messages
553
I''m lovin'' the .96''ers.
 

*sparkle*

Rough_Rock
Joined
Mar 25, 2008
Messages
40
Thanks, honey22!

Leon feels that strong blue fluorescence in a center stone is a pretty obvious effect in the sunlight, and that it would be difficult to match the level of fluorescence exactly in the sidestones. He thought that it might be possible to find two sidestones with fluorescence, but that it might take some time and even then, they might not match in terms of how much each one fluoresces. Over time, he thought the mismatch might bother me. It wouldn''t have mattered if I had wanted a solitaire, or if the stone were not as strongly fluorescent, but in the end it seemed too complicated and I opted to look for another center stone instead.
 

*sparkle*

Rough_Rock
Joined
Mar 25, 2008
Messages
40
Gosh thanks for your votes, scarlet16, Diamond*Dana, Ellen, NeverEndingUpgrade, julesbeth, LaurenThePartier, NewEnglandLady, SanDiegoLady, gwendolyn, Fly Girl, surfgirl, Imdanny, anne h, decodelighted, icekid, mercoledi, and facetgirl!!!

I just got off the phone with Leon, and he''s recommending the 0.96ers! He said that normally he likes smaller side stones, but with the slightly elongated shape of my cushion, he thinks that the 0.96ers flow the best. Although he had originally suggested recutting the pears for a more antiquey look (this was before he had sourced any of the sidestones), he now thinks that''ll be more of a headache than it''s worth, since the faceting pattern already matches well.

So...I guess the bottom line is that I''m going with the 0.96ers! Thanks SO much for all your input, ladies! I''m so excited to get this project finally underway!!!
5.gif
 

Linda W

Super_Ideal_Rock
Joined
Feb 15, 2006
Messages
10,630
Oh my, that is going to be one gorgeous ring!!!!
36.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
Be a part of the community Get 3 HCA Results
Top