shape
carat
color
clarity

Absolute Newb: Where to start?

Jmlleiva

Rough_Rock
Joined
Apr 4, 2016
Messages
75
Talked to her last night. She changed her mind on the yellow. She wants a regular diamond, nothing fancy colored. I'm thinking a round cut.

I think she would like 3 Stone Setting, but a solitaire would also work.

What clarity/carat/color combo should I be looking for to get the best value. My budget is $10-12K. This includes setting.

Specific links would be awesome as I am clueless. Thanks for the ideas.
 

msop04

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
10,051
Jmlleiva|1462287733|4026551 said:
Talked to her last night. She changed her mind on the yellow. She wants a regular diamond, nothing fancy colored. I'm thinking a round cut.

I think she would like 3 Stone Setting, but simpler is okay.

Well, that certainly helps narrow it down. :)) ...a three stone setting will be significantly more expensive than a solitaire or one with smaller diamonds. Did she say she wanted a three stone, specifically? The reason I ask is bc if you used almost all your budget on the center diamond in a solitaire or simpler setting, she could upgrade to a three stone later on or for an anniversary... :bigsmile:
 

msop04

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
10,051
If it were me, I'd reach out to IDJ and have Yuki find you the biggest, best "PS-picky" rock for your budget and set it in a classic six prong solitaire in platinum. ...but I'm a size whore, so... :bigsmile: :cheeky:
 

farrahlyn

Brilliant_Rock
Premium
Joined
Sep 22, 2015
Messages
1,170
maybe i'm in the minority but if she's mentioned 3 stone, go 3 stone! SO classy and you can still afford a nice sized center stone with your budget. I really like the WF Trellis setting ($2109 [with wire transfer] with the .50ctw side stones) and looking at the pictures, a 1.3ct/1.4ct stone looks really nice in that setting. VERY classy setting i think and a 3 stone really packs a punch visually.

http://www.whiteflash.com/engagemen...tone-trellis-diamond-engagement-ring-1428.htm

There are some nice 1.3/1.4ct ACA's and Expert Selections within your remaining budget. Do a wire transfer and you get a little discount too.
 

msop04

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
10,051
farrahlyn|1462294485|4026590 said:
maybe i'm in the minority but if she's mentioned 3 stone, go 3 stone! SO classy and you can still afford a nice sized center stone with your budget. I really like the WF Trellis setting ($2109 [with wire transfer] with the .50ctw side stones) and looking at the pictures, a 1.3ct/1.4ct stone looks really nice in that setting. VERY classy setting i think and a 3 stone really packs a punch visually.

http://www.whiteflash.com/engagemen...tone-trellis-diamond-engagement-ring-1428.htm

There are some nice 1.3/1.4ct ACA's and Expert Selections within your remaining budget. Do a wire transfer and you get a little discount too.

Oh, I love a 3-stone, don't get me wrong! :love: ...I just thought that, unless she specifically mentioned it, then I'd go for the biggest diamond! hehehe :bigsmile: ;))
 

farrahlyn

Brilliant_Rock
Premium
Joined
Sep 22, 2015
Messages
1,170
msop04|1462294616|4026591 said:
farrahlyn|1462294485|4026590 said:
maybe i'm in the minority but if she's mentioned 3 stone, go 3 stone! SO classy and you can still afford a nice sized center stone with your budget. I really like the WF Trellis setting ($2109 [with wire transfer] with the .50ctw side stones) and looking at the pictures, a 1.3ct/1.4ct stone looks really nice in that setting. VERY classy setting i think and a 3 stone really packs a punch visually.

http://www.whiteflash.com/engagemen...tone-trellis-diamond-engagement-ring-1428.htm

There are some nice 1.3/1.4ct ACA's and Expert Selections within your remaining budget. Do a wire transfer and you get a little discount too.

Oh, I love a 3-stone, don't get me wrong! :love: ...I just thought that, unless she specifically mentioned it, then I'd go for the biggest diamond! hehehe :bigsmile: ;))


Absolutely, I don't think you can go wrong with either one! :lol:
 

Jmlleiva

Rough_Rock
Joined
Apr 4, 2016
Messages
75
I went to a jeweler here in Virginia. I told them my budget and showed them a picture of what I was looking for. The picture I showed her is shown below.

screen_shot_2016-05-03_at_2_0.png

She told me I would want a diamond to be at least I in color and in the S1 Range. (My budget is 10-12K).
She said the ratio should be 3 to 1. (Side diamonds should be a 1)


I did some of my own preliminary research on Blue Nile and got this. I'm flying blind since I don't know what I'm doing. Let me know what you guys think.
1_59.png
 

msop04

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
10,051
Jmlleiva|1462300863|4026625 said:
I went to a jeweler here in Virginia. I told them my budget and showed them a picture of what I was looking for.

She told me I would want a diamond to be at least I in color and in the S1 Range. (My budget is 10-12K).

The setting you choose will be a major factor in how much you'll have left in the budget for a center stone? So are you going to go with a solitaire or a three stone?
 

Jmlleiva

Rough_Rock
Joined
Apr 4, 2016
Messages
75
msop04|1462301189|4026631 said:
Jmlleiva|1462300863|4026625 said:
I went to a jeweler here in Virginia. I told them my budget and showed them a picture of what I was looking for.

She told me I would want a diamond to be at least I in color and in the S1 Range. (My budget is 10-12K).

The setting you choose will be a major factor in how much you'll have left in the budget for a center stone? So are you going to go with a solitaire or a three stone?

I'm open to going with either. As long as it is within my budget. ($10-$12K). I prefer a three stone.

Is a three stone necessarily more expensive? My friend told me that isn't always the case.
 

msop04

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
10,051
Jmlleiva|1462301895|4026638 said:
msop04|1462301189|4026631 said:
Jmlleiva|1462300863|4026625 said:
I went to a jeweler here in Virginia. I told them my budget and showed them a picture of what I was looking for.

She told me I would want a diamond to be at least I in color and in the S1 Range. (My budget is 10-12K).

The setting you choose will be a major factor in how much you'll have left in the budget for a center stone? So are you going to go with a solitaire or a three stone?

I'm open to going with either. As long as it is within my budget. ($10-$12K). I prefer a three stone.

Is a three stone necessarily more expensive? My friend told me that isn't always the case.

A setting with larger diamonds on the sides will be MUCH more expensive than a classic solitaire setting. This will eat into the budget significantly for the center stone. A solitaire will allow a larger diamond. A three stone will not. It's just preference.
 

Jmlleiva

Rough_Rock
Joined
Apr 4, 2016
Messages
75
msop04|1462302048|4026641 said:
Jmlleiva|1462301895|4026638 said:
msop04|1462301189|4026631 said:
Jmlleiva|1462300863|4026625 said:
I went to a jeweler here in Virginia. I told them my budget and showed them a picture of what I was looking for.

She told me I would want a diamond to be at least I in color and in the S1 Range. (My budget is 10-12K).

The setting you choose will be a major factor in how much you'll have left in the budget for a center stone? So are you going to go with a solitaire or a three stone?

I'm open to going with either. As long as it is within my budget. ($10-$12K). I prefer a three stone.

Is a three stone necessarily more expensive? My friend told me that isn't always the case.

A setting with larger diamonds on the sides will be MUCH more expensive than a classic solitaire setting. This will eat into the budget significantly for the center stone. A solitaire will allow a larger diamond. A three stone will not. It's just preference.

Ah, gotcha.

So if I were to go for Solitaire with my budget (10-12K), what diamond do you recommend? I'm clueless when it comes to color and clarity. I feel like there are so many combinations.
 

msop04

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
10,051
Jmlleiva|1462302262|4026644 said:
Ah, gotcha.

So if I were to go for Solitaire with my budget (10-12K), what diamond do you recommend? I'm clueless when it comes to color and clarity. I feel like there are so many combinations.

Is your gf color sensitive? Have you looked at diamonds together? If not, I'd say try for H color and eye clean... Let me see what I can find.
 

Jmlleiva

Rough_Rock
Joined
Apr 4, 2016
Messages
75
Might I add that she wears a size 5 1/2 - 6. I don't know if that makes a difference. The lady told me that the setting shown below wouldn't look good because her finger is small. The three stone setting would work but nothing on the sides since it wouldn't be visible. screen_shot_2016-05-03_at_2_0.png
 

Jmlleiva

Rough_Rock
Joined
Apr 4, 2016
Messages
75
msop04|1462302456|4026648 said:
Jmlleiva|1462302262|4026644 said:
Ah, gotcha.

So if I were to go for Solitaire with my budget (10-12K), what diamond do you recommend? I'm clueless when it comes to color and clarity. I feel like there are so many combinations.

Is your gf color sensitive? Have you looked at diamonds together? If not, I'd say try for H color and eye clean... Let me see what I can find.

Thanks for responding msop04.

What does color sensitive mean? I think it means how unclear it is. I would like the diamond to be clear.

No we haven't looked at Diamonds together.

What does Eye Clean mean?

Thanks for the help. Excuse the question. Newbie here trying to get the most bang for my buck. Thanks.
 

msop04

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
10,051
Jmlleiva|1462302484|4026649 said:
Might I add that she wears a size 5 1/2 - 6. I don't know if that makes a difference. The lady told me that the setting shown below wouldn't look good because her finger is small. The three stone setting would work but nothing on the sides since it wouldn't be visible. screen_shot_2016-05-03_at_2_0.png

Hmmmm... If I'm being honest, I do not like that ring. At all. It looks very dated. Her ring size is on the smaller side, so that's a good thing - - diamond will look bigger! ;))
 

ringo865

Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Feb 14, 2014
Messages
2,897
That picture you showed has three diamonds but also it has a bunch of diamonds going down the sides. Those extra stones cost money. Also, I note the center stone you chose is only a very good cut. PSers recommend GIA excellent cut or AGS ideal cut. You could drop clarity from VVS, as a vs2 and likely even si1 will be eye-clean.

I would, like some other posters suggest, get a big nice solitaire now, and then if she wanted to change it to a three stone later.
 

Jmlleiva

Rough_Rock
Joined
Apr 4, 2016
Messages
75
ringo865|1462302796|4026655 said:
That picture you showed has three diamonds but also it has a bunch of diamonds going down the sides. Those extra stones cost money. Also, I note the center stone you chose is only a very good cut. PSers recommend GIA excellent cut or AGS ideal cut. You could drop clarity from VVS, as a vs2 and likely even si1 will be eye-clean.

I would, like some other posters suggest, get a big nice solitaire now, and then if she wanted to change it to a three stone later.

Yeh, I think that is the best way to go. Any suggestions?

My budget is $10-12K with setting. I would prefer more towards the $10K side.
 

Jmlleiva

Rough_Rock
Joined
Apr 4, 2016
Messages
75
msop04|1462302774|4026654 said:
Jmlleiva|1462302484|4026649 said:
Might I add that she wears a size 5 1/2 - 6. I don't know if that makes a difference. The lady told me that the setting shown below wouldn't look good because her finger is small. The three stone setting would work but nothing on the sides since it wouldn't be visible. screen_shot_2016-05-03_at_2_0.png

Hmmmm... If I'm being honest, I do not like that ring. At all. It looks very dated. Her ring size is on the smaller side, so that's a good thing - - diamond will look bigger! ;))

Yeh, she has small hands. I think I may switch to Solitaire now and later on if she wants a three stone, I could go that route.

I just feel like Solitaires are boring. I hope to be proven wrong.
 

msop04

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
10,051
Jmlleiva|1462302641|4026652 said:
msop04|1462302456|4026648 said:
Jmlleiva|1462302262|4026644 said:
Ah, gotcha.

So if I were to go for Solitaire with my budget (10-12K), what diamond do you recommend? I'm clueless when it comes to color and clarity. I feel like there are so many combinations.

Is your gf color sensitive? Have you looked at diamonds together? If not, I'd say try for H color and eye clean... Let me see what I can find.

Thanks for responding msop04.

What does color sensitive mean? I think it means how unclear it is. I would like the diamond to be clear.

No we haven't looked at Diamonds together.

What does Eye Clean mean?

Thanks for the help. Excuse the question. Newbie here trying to get the most bang for my buck. Thanks.

In other words...

Some people can see tint in otherwise colorless stones and others cannot. I am not very color sensitive. I have a 3.33 ct I color and it looks amazingly white to my eyes. I had a 2.43 ct J before, and I could notice a little tint at certain angles and on the side. I don't see any in my I color though.

Eye clean refers to the clarity of the stone. An "eye clean" stone will appear to have no inclusions visible to the unaided eye. Your best bet is to try to find a clean SI to maximize your budget. If not, then you'd have to go to VS, which is considerably more expensive.

No worries! These are good questions!
 

msop04

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
10,051
Jmlleiva|1462303084|4026659 said:
msop04|1462302774|4026654 said:
Jmlleiva|1462302484|4026649 said:
Might I add that she wears a size 5 1/2 - 6. I don't know if that makes a difference. The lady told me that the setting shown below wouldn't look good because her finger is small. The three stone setting would work but nothing on the sides since it wouldn't be visible. screen_shot_2016-05-03_at_2_0.png

Hmmmm... If I'm being honest, I do not like that ring. At all. It looks very dated. Her ring size is on the smaller side, so that's a good thing - - diamond will look bigger! ;))

Yeh, she has small hands. I think I may switch to Solitaire now and later on if she wants a three stone, I could go that route.

I just feel like Solitaires are boring. I hope to be proven wrong.

I think that's the best decision... can't go wrong with a solitaire! Let me look around!
 

leukolenos

Brilliant_Rock
Premium
Joined
Mar 27, 2016
Messages
825
Jmlleiva|1462303084|4026659 said:
msop04|1462302774|4026654 said:
Jmlleiva|1462302484|4026649 said:
Might I add that she wears a size 5 1/2 - 6. I don't know if that makes a difference. The lady told me that the setting shown below wouldn't look good because her finger is small. The three stone setting would work but nothing on the sides since it wouldn't be visible. screen_shot_2016-05-03_at_2_0.png

Hmmmm... If I'm being honest, I do not like that ring. At all. It looks very dated. Her ring size is on the smaller side, so that's a good thing - - diamond will look bigger! ;))

Yeh, she has small hands. I think I may switch to Solitaire now and later on if she wants a three stone, I could go that route.

I just feel like Solitaires are boring. I hope to be proven wrong.

Solitaires are totally not boring! There's a reason everyone and their mom copies the classic Tiffany ;-)
That being said, there are some really unique solitaire settings!

Like this- I love this one! https://www.etsy.com/listing/236143478/the-julia-diamond-eight-prong-solitaire?ref=shop_home_active_3
 

Jmlleiva

Rough_Rock
Joined
Apr 4, 2016
Messages
75
leukolenos|1462304467|4026674 said:
Jmlleiva|1462303084|4026659 said:
msop04|1462302774|4026654 said:
Jmlleiva|1462302484|4026649 said:
Might I add that she wears a size 5 1/2 - 6. I don't know if that makes a difference. The lady told me that the setting shown below wouldn't look good because her finger is small. The three stone setting would work but nothing on the sides since it wouldn't be visible. screen_shot_2016-05-03_at_2_0.png

Hmmmm... If I'm being honest, I do not like that ring. At all. It looks very dated. Her ring size is on the smaller side, so that's a good thing - - diamond will look bigger! ;))

Yeh, she has small hands. I think I may switch to Solitaire now and later on if she wants a three stone, I could go that route.

I just feel like Solitaires are boring. I hope to be proven wrong.

Solitaires are totally not boring! There's a reason everyone and their mom copies the classic Tiffany ;-)
That being said, there are some really unique solitaire settings!

Like this- I love this one! https://www.etsy.com/listing/236143478/the-julia-diamond-eight-prong-solitaire?ref=shop_home_active_3

Doesn't that one have diamonds on the side, which will decrease the amount I can spend on my center diamond?
 

msop04

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
10,051

Jmlleiva

Rough_Rock
Joined
Apr 4, 2016
Messages
75
msop04|1462305259|4026684 said:
What about this:
http://www.jamesallen.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut/1.65-carat-i-color-vs2-clarity-excellent-cut-sku-1071370
...and, yes, I know this scores 2.7 on the HCA, but I still think it would be pretty.

In this setting:
http://www.jamesallen.com/engagement-rings/solitaire/platinum-six-prong-knife-edged-solitaire-engagement-ring-handmade-item-2426
This is the prettiest solitaire setting! Very classic Tiffany!

I will keep looking...

What does 2.7 on the HCA mean?
 

msop04

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
10,051
Jmlleiva|1462305570|4026690 said:
msop04|1462305259|4026684 said:
What about this:
http://www.jamesallen.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut/1.65-carat-i-color-vs2-clarity-excellent-cut-sku-1071370
...and, yes, I know this scores 2.7 on the HCA, but I still think it would be pretty.

In this setting:
http://www.jamesallen.com/engagement-rings/solitaire/platinum-six-prong-knife-edged-solitaire-engagement-ring-handmade-item-2426
This is the prettiest solitaire setting! Very classic Tiffany!

I will keep looking...

What does 2.7 on the HCA mean?

The HCA is an exclusion tool... a score of 2 or below would warrant another look, and a score of above 2 would be excluded. I will say that there have been stones that scored above 2 that were still lovely, despite the HCA score.
 

msop04

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
10,051
I wanted to add that the HCA only applies to modern cut rounds.
 

Jmlleiva

Rough_Rock
Joined
Apr 4, 2016
Messages
75
What is a better bang for your buck, James Allen or Blue Nile?

I want to order the diamond online and have them set it.
 

msop04

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
10,051
Jmlleiva|1462309815|4026729 said:
What is a better bang for your buck, James Allen or Blue Nile?

I want to order the diamond online and have them set it.

I never look at BN's inventory because you can't see the stones. You'd have to choose a VS to ensure that it's clean. That can eat up a budget when there are eye clean SI's that are less expensive. BN has good diamonds, I just can't recommend any of them unless the specs are higher.
 

msop04

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
10,051
To better answer your question, BN is less expensive than JA by a little. The downfall is that you can't see the stones, so it can be a little more difficult to choose a nice one. That said, BN has a great return policy should you decide to use them. I didn't want you to think BN was "bad" or whatever. :))
 
Be a part of the community Get 3 HCA Results
Top