windowshopper
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2004
- Messages
- 2,023
i am just curious what people think. it is the one shape that i would never consider yet they are immensely popular...
This is also what I think. When my then fiance and I first went shopping I picked out a princess cut, but then exchanged it for a RB a few days later. At the time, the ONLY square shape I knew of was princess-cut stones (keeping in mind, this was around 10 or so years ago!). Now, seeing all the other squarish shape options out there, I *for sure* would pick any one of them except a princess cut. It has a unique faceting pattern that just isn''t for me. . .I MUCH more would beg my husband (Date: 1/27/2005 5:27:17 PM
Author: blueroses
I think it might be because they are the most readily available square cut out there in the ''maul'' and other mainstream B&M world? I mean, if you go into most zales or kays-esque stores asking about square cuts, a princess will be the first thing they''ll show you,
I adore DIRT CHEAP DIAMONDS-------------just bought from them and couldnt be more pleased all the way aroundDate: 1/27/2005 5:55:17 PM
Author: Dropdown3
I agree with the post above that it''s kind of modern to like the princess cut. I''m a traditionalist, I like the RB, however, my GF likes princess cut.
Princesslover: I''m also considering a diamond from dirtcheapdiamonds.com, are they reasonable on bands and setting everything up? Their prices are the best I''ve seen.
-Charles-
Hey,Date: 1/27/2005 5:55:17 PM
Author: Dropdown3
I agree with the post above that it''s kind of modern to like the princess cut. I''m a traditionalist, I like the RB, however, my GF likes princess cut.
Princesslover: I''m also considering a diamond from dirtcheapdiamonds.com, are they reasonable on bands and setting everything up? Their prices are the best I''ve seen.
-Charles-
I agree, one has to see what looks good on ones fingers...I''m a 4.75, and the 1.16ct princess looks just right for my hand!Date: 1/27/2005 6:35:25 PM
Author: amytude
I agree with a lot of what has been said. I''m 32 and have friends who have been married, divorced, and those who''ve never been married. In this last group, princess cut is def. most desirable choice. I do really like this cut, though not much for myself. I have somewhat short & chubby fingers and I just don''t like the look of it on me. I think it gives wonderful fire & brilliance, though! I''m pretty sure that asscher is going to continue in popularity as well. I''m wondering about the cushion cut. I thought I would LOVE it, then once I saw a few in person I realized it wasn''t for me (as a wedding ring, anway). I would love a fancy colored cushion for my right hand!
Aeli,Date: 1/27/2005 7:486 PM
Author: aeli
Personally, I like the sparkle of a princess cut as opposed to other square stones (although square radiants and cushions are my favorite fancy shapes). As to why they''re so popular, I think Blueroses hit the nail on the head when she said they''re one of the more readily available square cuts. I went into Saks requesting to see a ring advertised in a magazine with a square radiant. The salesperson explained to me that there was ''no such stone - the only square cuts are princess and square emeralds.''
Thanks folks,Date: 1/27/2005 907 PM
Author: abbott
Princesslover.. What is the stats of your princess... It is beautiful !!! Thanks!! Abbott
well i didnt start the post as an i hate princess cut thing--it was prompted by an enormous number of posts about people looking for them and i just have never even considered them so i was just curious.................princess lover your ring sis stunning!Date: 1/27/2005 7:486 PM
Author: aeli
Personally, I like the sparkle of a princess cut as opposed to other square stones (although square radiants and cushions are my favorite fancy shapes). As to why they''re so popular, I think Blueroses hit the nail on the head when she said they''re one of the more readily available square cuts. I went into Saks requesting to see a ring advertised in a magazine with a square radiant. The salesperson explained to me that there was ''no such stone - the only square cuts are princess and square emeralds.''
Sorry if my earlier post sounded...accusatory somehow - it certainly wasn''t meant that way. Actually, it''s very interesting hearing all the different views on the different shapes because I''ve often wondered the same thing myself. In fact, I would never have considered a pear, but I think this one is quite lovely.style="WIDTH: 99.38%; HEIGHT: 100px">Date: 1/28/2005 126:33 AM
Author: windowshopper
well i didnt start the post as an i hate princess cut thing--it was prompted by an enormous number of posts about people looking for them and i just have never even considered them so i was just curious.................princess lover your ring sis stunning!
Sorry, my internet''s been down...Date: 1/27/2005 111:48 PM
Author: abbott
Princesslover... When you were looking for your diamond... what range % were you looking for the depth??? for the table??? Thanks!! ABBOTT
its funny you mention that ring--i too am not a "pear" person but that ring is awesome. i didnt atke it as accusatory just wanted to make sure people understood it was just general curiosityDate: 1/28/2005 11:44:23 AM
Author: aeli
Sorry if my earlier post sounded...accusatory somehow - it certainly wasn''t meant that way. Actually, it''s very interesting hearing all the different views on the different shapes because I''ve often wondered the same thing myself. In fact, I would never have considered a pear, but I think this one is quite lovely.style="WIDTH: 99.38%; HEIGHT: 100px">Date: 1/28/2005 126:33 AM
Author: windowshopper
well i didnt start the post as an i hate princess cut thing--it was prompted by an enormous number of posts about people looking for them and i just have never even considered them so i was just curious.................princess lover your ring sis stunning!