Madison2
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2012
- Messages
- 507
Hello All,
I am working with a pricescope vendor and he has provided aset image for two cushion diamonds that I saw in person and really liked
I am not an expert on aset images for fancy cuts so I am asking for your help. For those of you who are experts in reading aset images on fancy cut diamonds, which one do you think has the better light return? Both cushions are modified brilliant and not crushed ice facet pattern.
I am going to try to post pics of the facet patterns so you can get a better idea.
I have seen both diamonds in person and both have a nice fire and brilliance in different lighting conditions, however I would love to hear your thoughts. I think I know which one I want but just want another opinion. Both are GIA Certified.
Diamond #1
2.83 I VS2
Excellent/VG
Girdle Thin-Thick
Table 64
Depth 69
Measurements: 8.20 x 7.88 x5.47
Diamond #2
2.30 HVVS2
Excellent/VG
Girdle Medium-Thick
Table 63
Depth 69.7
Meaurements: 7.44 x 7.44 x 5.19
Aset Image for 2.83 I VS2
I am working with a pricescope vendor and he has provided aset image for two cushion diamonds that I saw in person and really liked
I am not an expert on aset images for fancy cuts so I am asking for your help. For those of you who are experts in reading aset images on fancy cut diamonds, which one do you think has the better light return? Both cushions are modified brilliant and not crushed ice facet pattern.
I am going to try to post pics of the facet patterns so you can get a better idea.
I have seen both diamonds in person and both have a nice fire and brilliance in different lighting conditions, however I would love to hear your thoughts. I think I know which one I want but just want another opinion. Both are GIA Certified.
Diamond #1
2.83 I VS2
Excellent/VG
Girdle Thin-Thick
Table 64
Depth 69
Measurements: 8.20 x 7.88 x5.47
Diamond #2
2.30 HVVS2
Excellent/VG
Girdle Medium-Thick
Table 63
Depth 69.7
Meaurements: 7.44 x 7.44 x 5.19
Aset Image for 2.83 I VS2