I bought a Leo Princess today. In the store they showed me the IGI report from 10/06/04. They told me I could go online to Leo’s web site and see more info. I did, on Leo’s web site there is another IGI report, but from 12/13/04. Interesting…Wow the data was a lot more different on that newer report than I expected!
1st report then 2nd report
5.50 X 5.41 X 4.11, 5.45 X 5.43 X 3.85
I found that remarkable 4.11 vs 3.85 I am no expert but 6.7% seems like a lot!
0.98 Ct, 0.98 ct
depth: 75.9%, 70.9% here we go again 5% difference
table: 74%, 72.5
girdle: very thin to thick, thin to slightly thick
cutlet: none, none
polish: very good, good
symmetry: good, good
clarity: VS2, SI1
color: H, I
I guess I should see an appraiser, unless there is an educated way to guess which report is more accurate?
I just returned a non-branded (GIA report) 0.90ct E, VS1, depth 68.8%, table 68%, polish/symmetry: excellent/excellent. When I compared them side, by side this Leo did look to have more sparkle and fire to my untrained eye. I hope I made a good decision and would have really had to think it over a little more if in the store they told me the Leo was a I, SI1. It is definitely eye clean and did seem to sparkle more.
I paid $5,600 for the Leo, but only $4,800 (including plat band and tiffany setting) for the other.