llnathanll
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- May 28, 2012
- Messages
- 8
Hello - I've spent alot of time reading this website and this is my first post This diamond is currently on hold and I'm curious to get feedback on if this will be "eye clean" from about 5" away.
http://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/H-VS2-Excellent-Cut-Round-Diamond-1500377.asp
Feedback I've received from JA Sales Agent... This is the first response. "I see what you meant by this diamond not being "eye clean". In all honesty, it completely depends on the diamond and how great the cut is. Round brilliant diamonds tend to hide their inclusions very well when the cut of the diamond was graded excellent or ideal. I feel that with this diamond, the inclusions will blend nicely and mask very well. If that is a concern, we can always swap this one out for another that has less inclusions on the table. Just let me know how you want to proceed and will make it happen. "
This is the 2nd response from the SA after I asked him to verified if it's "eye clean" since I don't want to go through the hassle of swapping..."I can assure that this diamond is 100%, completely "eye clean". I often forget that we are looking at a diamond that is 10x larger than it will be in person and with the loupe, it adds another 10x. So, with the loupe and the magnified image, we are seeing that diamond at 20x magnification."
I respect the SA opinion and believe he is correct but I still have some doubt since the inclusion is pretty visible in the picture. I would appreciate it if I can get some opinion on this
Thanks!
http://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/H-VS2-Excellent-Cut-Round-Diamond-1500377.asp
Feedback I've received from JA Sales Agent... This is the first response. "I see what you meant by this diamond not being "eye clean". In all honesty, it completely depends on the diamond and how great the cut is. Round brilliant diamonds tend to hide their inclusions very well when the cut of the diamond was graded excellent or ideal. I feel that with this diamond, the inclusions will blend nicely and mask very well. If that is a concern, we can always swap this one out for another that has less inclusions on the table. Just let me know how you want to proceed and will make it happen. "
This is the 2nd response from the SA after I asked him to verified if it's "eye clean" since I don't want to go through the hassle of swapping..."I can assure that this diamond is 100%, completely "eye clean". I often forget that we are looking at a diamond that is 10x larger than it will be in person and with the loupe, it adds another 10x. So, with the loupe and the magnified image, we are seeing that diamond at 20x magnification."
I respect the SA opinion and believe he is correct but I still have some doubt since the inclusion is pretty visible in the picture. I would appreciate it if I can get some opinion on this
Thanks!