Miss Fortune
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2008
- Messages
- 682
http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/4599/
Thank you!
Thank you!
sounds ok, pics?Date: 11/26/2008 2:16:19 PM
Author: Miss Fortune
of course. I thought the table on this one was 63%. I can''t keep my stones straight with this upgrade. I''m looking at so many. Thanks you guys.
What do you think of the sarin report on this 1.72ct??
width 6.51 length 6.50 L/W 1.0
depth mm 4.44 - 68.3
table 63.6
crown height 16.2 crown angle
pavil height 48.6 pavil angle
girdle culet off 1.0%
girdle thick mm 2.2 1.3.2.7
Thanks as always!
Date: 11/26/2008 2:35:21 PM
Author: Garry H (Cut Nut)
looks good - a little worried about dark zones in center - an ASET or idealscope would clear that up
Date: 11/26/2008 2:36:41 PM
Author: strmrdr
ah the infamous JA diamond.
looks great.
Did you get an IS of it?
It looks kicken to me but an IS is a good idea to double check since one is available from JA.
Put it on hold if you haven''t already...
yesDate: 11/26/2008 2:47:20 PM
Author: Miss Fortune
Date: 11/26/2008 2:36:41 PM
Author: strmrdr
ah the infamous JA diamond.
looks great.
Did you get an IS of it?
It looks kicken to me but an IS is a good idea to double check since one is available from JA.
Put it on hold if you haven''t already...
but the steps and windmills look good correct? your thoughts??
Why infamous?Date: 11/26/2008 2:36:41 PM
Author: strmrdr
ah the infamous JA diamond.
3-4 people are looking at it so far and posting about it.Date: 11/26/2008 3:19:29 PM
Author: Regular Guy
Date: 11/26/2008 2:36:41 PM
Author: strmrdr
ah the infamous JA diamond.
Why infamous?