lawgirl2831
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2005
- Messages
- 14
OK. I give. I have spent hours trying to figure out how you figure out spreads and all kind of complicated stuff and I just can''t take it anymore LOL
Here are 3 stones I am getting ready to view soon.
Thoughts on the cut? They seem a little deep but not horrible and the girdles are thick but I''m discovering that the choices in square radiants is not particuarly plentiful!
I know you have to view them, but just wondering if any should be thrown out - I understand that you can generally rule out, but not in, Radiants on numbers?
Stone One
2.00
7.17x7.05x4.81
depth 68.2
table 65
polish EX
symmetry GD
no Fluorescence or culet
girdle STK-TK
Stone Two
1.76
6.85x6.8x4.63
depth 68.1
table 63
polish EX
symmetry GD
no Fluorescence or culet
girdle TH-VTK
Stone Three
1.52
6.53x6.51x4.42
depth 67.1
table 62
polish EX
symmetry VG
no Fluorescence or culet
girdle TK
Here are 3 stones I am getting ready to view soon.
Thoughts on the cut? They seem a little deep but not horrible and the girdles are thick but I''m discovering that the choices in square radiants is not particuarly plentiful!
I know you have to view them, but just wondering if any should be thrown out - I understand that you can generally rule out, but not in, Radiants on numbers?
Stone One
2.00
7.17x7.05x4.81
depth 68.2
table 65
polish EX
symmetry GD
no Fluorescence or culet
girdle STK-TK
Stone Two
1.76
6.85x6.8x4.63
depth 68.1
table 63
polish EX
symmetry GD
no Fluorescence or culet
girdle TH-VTK
Stone Three
1.52
6.53x6.51x4.42
depth 67.1
table 62
polish EX
symmetry VG
no Fluorescence or culet
girdle TK