iwannaprettyone
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2002
- Messages
- 3,684
I''m not Mara, but I think I can help.Date: 11/20/2007 4:48:08 PM
Author:iwannaprettyone
I found this post link and now I am wondering if I am going to feel this way when my earrings come being that my stone is not an ACA.
How big a difference was there between the ACA and your original non branded stone?
Thanks for the reply, I guess my original post didn''t make perfect sense. The earrings are .4 ACAs and my E-ring stone is just an very well cut stone. I am hoping that I still love my e-ring stone once I receive my ACA''s. I adore my stone it is super firey, but lacks the H&As.Date: 11/20/2007 5:48:08 PM
Author: aljdewey
I''m not Mara, but I think I can help.Date: 11/20/2007 4:48:08 PM
Author:iwannaprettyone
I found this post link and now I am wondering if I am going to feel this way when my earrings come being that my stone is not an ACA.
How big a difference was there between the ACA and your original non branded stone?
The issue with Mara''s original stone (not from WF) wasn''t lack of branding....it was lack of being a top-make. Her original stone wasn''t the top-shelf cut - it was rather shallow and didn''t have a lot of fire.
When she did her first upgrade, it was to an ES stone, which was still not an ACA, but WAS well-cut and had proportions akin to an ACA.
When she compared her originals stone to her husband''s ACA, she noticed a difference because his stone was better cut, not because simply because it was branded.
Accordingly, if your earrings are top-make stones (even though they aren''t ACA), I''m sure you''ll love them.