antigoon
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2004
- Messages
- 30
I''ve seen a great diamond on Whiteflash
By the numbers it''s great:
HCA: 1.3 (0.8 - 1.3 if you take the best- and worst-case combinations of crown and pavilion angles)
Table: 56%
Depth: 62%
Crown Angle: 34.7
Pavilion Angle: 40.8
(You can see the full Sarin report on the diamon''s webpage.)
This has the kind of perportions that I''ve found quite difficult to find, especially in an ACA diamond which usually push the limits a little more in terms of getting more size out of the diamond, pushing them closer to ''the cliff''
So I''m quite surprised when I look at its ideal-scope image and it shows lots of light leakage on the outer facets. (Indicating a too deep cut?)
Does the ideal-scope picuture match the numbers? Am I simply wrong about the numbers being so good?
Steve
By the numbers it''s great:
HCA: 1.3 (0.8 - 1.3 if you take the best- and worst-case combinations of crown and pavilion angles)
Table: 56%
Depth: 62%
Crown Angle: 34.7
Pavilion Angle: 40.8
(You can see the full Sarin report on the diamon''s webpage.)
This has the kind of perportions that I''ve found quite difficult to find, especially in an ACA diamond which usually push the limits a little more in terms of getting more size out of the diamond, pushing them closer to ''the cliff''
So I''m quite surprised when I look at its ideal-scope image and it shows lots of light leakage on the outer facets. (Indicating a too deep cut?)
Does the ideal-scope picuture match the numbers? Am I simply wrong about the numbers being so good?
Steve