- Joined
- Apr 30, 2005
- Messages
- 33,398
A reverse osmosis filter removes zillions of yuckies that other filters can't.
The one I installed in my kitchen 21 years ago finally gave up the ghost. RIP
Being the old design it had a big water tank under the sink and used or "wasted" 3 gallons of water for every gallon of utra-pure, nearly-distilled, water that it produced.
Some of the newest RO units have no tank; they're like those instant heat-on-demand water heaters with no tank.
The are smaller, and this particular model uses "wastes" only 1 gallon for every gallon of pure water.
You can think of the water "wasted" the same way you think of the water used to launder your clothes or wash your dishes.
You can send that "waste" water down the drain or save it for watering your lawn or washing your floors and cars.
We use about 2 gallons a day, so that's almost enough for one toilet flush.
Amazon prime has it now, discounted $72 or 20%, for "Prime Days", which ends tomorrow Oct 14 at 11:59 PM PST.
Regularly it's $360, for but 48 hours it is only $288.
It is much easier for the user to install it compared to the old tankless ones.
This company, Waterdrop, makes 3 models.
The other 2 models waste twice as much water compared to this newest model in pic below.
Also, the new model has a 50% faster flow rate, 600 gallons per day vs. 400.
RO filtering the water that the city is already delivering to your home, via underground pipes, is VERY green compared to buying bottled water, having it delivered in a diesel-exhaust-belching truck, or buying Brita filters.
Overall RO water costs a tiny fraction of bottled water and tastes so good ... because it has no taste.
Reportedly the RO filters with tanks made water that had a detectable taste as the tank aged, but all the water from a tankless RO filter is fresh and has not been sitting around for glob knows how long.
The one I installed in my kitchen 21 years ago finally gave up the ghost. RIP
Being the old design it had a big water tank under the sink and used or "wasted" 3 gallons of water for every gallon of utra-pure, nearly-distilled, water that it produced.
Some of the newest RO units have no tank; they're like those instant heat-on-demand water heaters with no tank.
The are smaller, and this particular model uses "wastes" only 1 gallon for every gallon of pure water.
You can think of the water "wasted" the same way you think of the water used to launder your clothes or wash your dishes.
You can send that "waste" water down the drain or save it for watering your lawn or washing your floors and cars.
We use about 2 gallons a day, so that's almost enough for one toilet flush.
Amazon prime has it now, discounted $72 or 20%, for "Prime Days", which ends tomorrow Oct 14 at 11:59 PM PST.
Regularly it's $360, for but 48 hours it is only $288.
It is much easier for the user to install it compared to the old tankless ones.
This company, Waterdrop, makes 3 models.
The other 2 models waste twice as much water compared to this newest model in pic below.
Also, the new model has a 50% faster flow rate, 600 gallons per day vs. 400.
RO filtering the water that the city is already delivering to your home, via underground pipes, is VERY green compared to buying bottled water, having it delivered in a diesel-exhaust-belching truck, or buying Brita filters.
Overall RO water costs a tiny fraction of bottled water and tastes so good ... because it has no taste.
Reportedly the RO filters with tanks made water that had a detectable taste as the tank aged, but all the water from a tankless RO filter is fresh and has not been sitting around for glob knows how long.
Last edited: