Odd setting - redo or keep???

[blueapple]

I am looking for a new setting for a ring recently inherited. It''s a 2.00 carat round brilliant, H, SI1. It''s set with 2 single cut diamonds each approx. 0.02 carats and 4 ruby baguettes.

I am a huge fan of the simple Tiffany setting. As mentioned, I inherited this ring and my Godmother had it reset when she inherited it, however, used all the stones in the original setting (which I liked a lot better by the way). If I go with the Tiffany setting, I would obviously only use the diamond. If I don''t use them - what do I do with the rest of the stones?

I''m not a fan of the current setting either. It''s a little too, I don''t know - contemporary - for me?? But, it''s unique, and my Godmother had it created as far as I know. I am so completely torn. Any advice is welcomed. I am a huge fan of the forum and this is my first post. That''s the ring on my avatar.

Also - the current setting only has 4 prongs, and I can feel the diamond is lose. I''ve had it appraised and insured but am still worried!

 

[bookworm21]

Hi, do you happen to have a clearer picture of the ring? The one in your avatar seems slightly distorted and I can''t really make out the details, but from what I can see, it is very pretty. But will a need a larger pic to give an opinion.

 

[blueapple]

I hope this is a better photo of the setting. I am really new to this so bear with me.

 

[blueapple]

And from the side in the mirror. How off-balance is that with the large diamond and tiny little ones on the bottom?

Does that look odd to anyone else?

 

[bookworm21]

Hm....I personally don't like that setting, since it's not my style, but it is pretty and unusual.

First of all, if the diamond is loose in its setting, have it check and tightened by a jeweler right away! You don't want to risk losing the stone, even if it is insured.

I think a simple Tiffany solitaire setting would be nice for the center stone, and with it's size, it will really stand out beautifully. I guess that means that if the ring were mine, I'd have it reset.

As to what to do with the rest of the stones, that's a stumper. But then, I'm not very design oriented, so maybe some other people here will chime in.

ETA: And you're right, the profile shot does make the ring look off-balance. You can make the rubies and smaller stones into drop earrings, perhaps? I think that would be pretty.

 

[Kaleigh]

First of all what a nice ring to have inherited from your Godmother. That said I am not loving the setting either. I''d have the stone reset in a Tiffany setting. The other two diamonds are very small from what I can tell. Do you have any nieces that have their ears pierced or a little sister?? They would make nice studs for a young girl. Just a thought, love the stone!!!

 

[canuk-gal]

HI:

I am also a fan of theTiffany style setting, so I understand why you are drawn to it. Which finger/hand do you intend to wear this ring on? Is it meant for an ER or right hand ring? If you want to keep the "old" ring b/c it has sentimental value, then perhaps you could set a garnet or another (red) stone in it to match the baugettes, and choose a solitare style for the large diamond, and have two rings.

If you look in the vendor section of this forum (under resources) you may find several of them have multiple ring styles/designs from which to choose. Good luck and hope you find what you are looking for.

cheers--Sharon

 

[widget]

Hmm...I guess my only hesitation would be if I thought my Godmother might be hurt or offended if I remounted it.

But since it''s yours now...you should be able to do what you please!

I may be weird, but I sorta like that mounting....I think. Do you happen to have a full hand shot of it? Just curious.

Nice inheritance! And welcome to PS!

widget

 

[FireGoddess]

I HATE BEING A DEADLOCK VICTIM! ARGH!

Okay, anyway... (had to retype this whole post)

I hear ya - me no likey. At first I thought that, based on the avatar, the picture was of 2 rings and that the big stone somehow snuggled into a second ring where the baby diamonds are. But since it's not... I think a Tiff setting would be lovely! Perhaps a colored gemstone could be put into your godmother's mounting?

 

[moon river]

I''d have to put that big gorgeous stone in something less ''80''s Disco Queenish. I''m sure she would want you to be happy with the gift.

 

[sunkist]

What about putting the two small diamonds on the setting as surprise diamonds! You know, set on the sides of the head of the ring. That way you''d make positive use of alllll the diamonds!

Here''s an example if you have no idea what I''m talking about
http://www.whiteflash.com/Engagement-Rings/Styles/Solitaire/U-Prong-Domed-Shank-by-WF_747.htm

 

[Amandas_Jewels]

What a beautiful Diamond!

Yeah, it would look best in a Tiffany setting.
What to do with the 2 small diamonds and the rubies? hmmm
Well scince you prolly have a equal amount, earrings would be nice. ( a cluster style? )
But you could also do a pendant.
Or even make them into a band to wear somedays with the big solitare. ( I like this idea the best )
Whatever you do, i''m sure it will look great!
Can''t wait to see the changes!

 

[Odilia]

I agree with everyone else -I would reset the beautiful diamond. As for the setting, it''s not my type at all either, although it is certainly unique, so if you like it and think you''d ever wear it, I like the idea of putting a colored stone in there. If not, Kaleigh''s idea of tiny earrings for a young relative was good; other than that I''m not coming up with any great creative ideas myself right now.

(The only other thought I had was that you said the original setting was prettier; you could change it back to look like that, but since you said you want Tiffany, it didn''t sound like that was an option.)

 

[blueapple]

You all are so wonderful. I love the idea of replacing the stone with another one to keep this setting intact and I think that I could even take the diamonds out for small studs as well.

I am a so grateful for all of the ideas. Thanks so much.

Oh - did I mention that I LOVE the surprise diamonds. So many choices when I thought that I had none.

Again, thanks so much and I''ll keep everyone updated!!!

 

[mrssalvo]

Date: 4/5/2006 9:57:59 PM
Author: blueapple

Oh - did I mention that I LOVE the surprise diamonds. So many choices when I thought that I had none.

Welcome blueapple. If you love surprise diamonds
Scott Kay makes a ton of settings with them. Pearlmans Jewelers also carries Scott Kay and has a bunch pictures of his settings.

 

[dbgaap]

The ring makes me wonder if there was some secret significance to the design- like is it supposed to be the Big Dipper? I mean that is a goofy example but maybe the shapes and placement of stones was symbolic of something personal to her.

I''d want to put another inexpensive stone into it and hang onto it for sentimental reasons, then do a solitaire with the diamond.
There are certainly lots of beautiful solitaires out there. I have been shopping for a solitaire, too and I found that all the major brands seem to make at least one simple (beautifully designed) solitaire. The two I like best are from Vellaggio and Ritani.
Neither of them is glitzy.
Sorry I can''t locate any pics online to post.

Of course, you can always have something made, too.
Quest does a beautiful job at very fair price.
www.questjewelers.com

 

[monarch64]

Blueapple: Is it possible your godmother would appreciate getting the setting back someday with a Ruby set into it as the center? After looking closely, I understand the concept of the design and the ruby sidestones, just not the two little diamonds. I think it would look beautiful with a ruby center, but maybe without the two smaller diamonds. Did she give you this ring with the intent of you wearing it as is? Or is it a ring she designed herself that she really, really loved but gave to you out of the love and goodness of her heart, not ever expecting to get it back???

Sorry for rambling a bit. Sometimes I "type/think" out loud, lol!

 

[pricescope]

Blueapple, i don''t see why you can''t have all the stones re-set to a new setting like this?
Sorry for the lousy photoshop, it''s late, if you are interested i can work out better one tomorrow.

 

[Kaleigh]

Date: 4/5/2006 11:40:42 PM
Author: Pricescope
Blueapple, i don''t see why you can''t have all the stones re-set to a new setting like this?
Sorry for the lousy photoshop, it''s late, if you are interested i can work out better one tomorrow.

Oh I like that a lot!!! Great idea Irina!!!!

 

[blueapple]

That is beautiful. I love it.

As far as my Godmother, she passed away last year. All I know is that she inherited it from her aunt, my great-aunt - so the stones are family heirlooms. I know that she and her partner designed the setting so it was special to them, but she never wore it. I was honored when her partner presented it to me because of the family history and because she chose to give it to me. Since they designed the current setting, I don''t want to trash it completely, that''s why I love the idea of resetting it with another stone.

Again, this forum is made up of such wonderful people. I am so addicted.

 

[Tacori E-ring]

Date: 4/5/2006 11:40:42 PM
Author: Pricescope
Blueapple, i don''t see why you can''t have all the stones re-set to a new setting like this?

Sorry for the lousy photoshop, it''s late, if you are interested i can work out better one tomorrow.

Ohhh...I love that idea! It would be beautiful!

 

[AndyRosse]

Oh I love Irina''s suggestion, that way you could still do the tiffany head, but also incorporate the other diamonds!

And definitely put a different stone in the old setting, for sentimental reasons at least

 

[valeria101]

I wouldn''t worry much about the accent diamonds - they''d be like $10 each (OK, something like that).

Unusual as it is, the setting looks well done and flattering

maybe the status as engagement ring doesn''t do it much service, if you expect that to be a conservative classic

Why not set the diamond in the ring of your choice and have a different gem set in this setting? Even if it doesn''t get a ton a wear... it wouldn''t be ''destroyed'' and the pleasant memories with it. Besides who knows, maybe it will!

Many colored stones would be quite inexpensive in this size (many wouldn''t), but... why not give it a thought? For every color there should be a handful of options for just about any price conceivable: natural and synthetics included.

Just an idea

 

[glitterata]

Maybe your godmother''s partner would like to have the setting back, with another stone set in it? Maybe your godmother''s birthstone, or her own birthstone? That might be a sweet gesture, and she might like to have the ring to remember your godmother by. Perhaps if you presented it to her on your godmother''s birthday, or something like that.

I quite like that setting, I think it''s cool. But I doubt I would wear it either.

 

[moon river]

Date: 4/6/2006 4:16:45 PM
Author: glitterata
Maybe your godmother''s partner would like to have the setting back, with another stone set in it? Maybe your godmother''s birthstone, or her own birthstone? That might be a sweet gesture, and she might like to have the ring to remember your godmother by. Perhaps if you presented it to her on your godmother''s birthday, or something like that.

I quite like that setting, I think it''s cool. But I doubt I would wear it either.

I think that''s a lovely idea.