new radiant question

[akameme]

ok..so how does these specs sound? I plugged them into the DIY appraiser on gemapprasiers.com (with a guess on crown height %) and it came up with a 3A - which isn't great.

Here are the specs:
Radiant
1.21 carat (revised with correct carat weight)
71.4% depth
74% table
Girdle - Slightly thick
Polish/Symmetry - Very good/good
Cutlet - None
Color is E
Floursence (not sure, but I think it's none, will find out for sure on Friday)
Vs1
6.34 x 5.67 x 4.05

I'm going to see it in person on Friday - but any input is always appreciated.

 

[belle]

not great. what crown height did you put in?

 

[akameme]

I think i just put in 10%...the guy says the ring is sparkly...and likely the part of the cost is driven by the E color....

But once I ran the specs, i thought the depth and table weren''t great.

I may call him and ask him to see what else he can find with better table, etc....

Thanks for the quick reply...

 

[belle]

if you have certain parameters that you are looking for, let him know. you don''t want to waste your time, or his, with stones that won''t suit you............

 

[Nicrez]

I personally would see the stone before anything could be said. You can''t tell a radiant by numbers alone. Yes, it''s not an efficient stone, and I don''t know what the price is, but if it is over $7000 for an unbranded Radiant, then I think you should keep looking. A quick search on the site, showed that a comperable stone is about $7000 or less.

Good luck, and hope you find a well proportioned stone!