More Asschers

[Shigeko1]

Hey guys,
thanks for replying, here are the other asschers..
2)
Carat: 1.91
Cut: Asscher
Color: H
Clarity: VS1
Cut Quality: Very Good
Measurements: 6.76*6.64*5.05
L/W: 1.02
Depth: 76.1
Table: 61
Girdle: vtk
Polish: Very Good
Symmetry: Very Good
Fluorescence: None

3)
Shape: Asscher
Measurements: 6.98/6.76*5.07
Weight: 2.05 Carats
Depth: 75.0 %
Table: 53%
Girdle: Thick to very thick
Cutlet: none
Polish: good
Symmetry: good
clarity: VS2
Color:H
Fluorescence: faint

Thanks in advance

 

[Kaleigh]

We need pics in order to help you out. In the mean time take a look at www.goodoldgold.com they have some awesome asschers.

 

[strmrdr]

too deep even for me.
would take a steap discount for me to consider them.
second is two far off square to be top notch.
Are you working with a vendor or just pulling these out of a search?

 

[valeria101]

I wish there was something we could see ...


As is, there isn't much left to say about the couple of numbers. Perhaps these:

- about size:

Yeah, they are not 'shallow' but not overly deep either. The primary complaint about this extra depth is that it makes diamonds look smaller. (same goes for the thick girdle). But it is not hard to check that because size (diameters) are given on the lab report. As it happens, 2 carat square step cuts come at around 7mm (by eye ball on database above for a range of numbers). For ref. about .2mm makes a whiff of a visual difference.


- about shape:

Up to you to decide if squarer is better. The modern Asscher brand makes square stones but traditionally Asschers were not always square. I find the slightly rectangular ones pleasantly intriguing... and I am not alone in this as far as I know.


- anything else:

I tend to like small tables, but that would definitely not make me call in the second stone blindly if there was the slightest chance that the seller (or another seller with access to similar stones) can show what they look like.


My 0.2