found a stone...opinions appreciated :)

[snowgirl]

what do you guys think??
do you think the fluro is a good thing with this color grading??

Carat weight: 2.03
Cut: Very Good
Color: I
Clarity: VS2
Depth %: 68.6%
Table %: 73%
Symmetry: Very good
Polish: Very good
Girdle: Extremely thin to slightly thick
Culet: None
Fluorescence: Strong blue
Measurements: 7.16x7.10x4.87 mm
Length/width ratio: 1.01

 

[bamcw328i]

Date: 2/13/2006 4:39:22 PM
Author:snowgirl


what do you guys think??
do you think the fluro is a good thing with this color grading??

Carat weight: 2.03
Cut: Very Good
Color: I
Clarity: VS2
Depth %: 68.6%
Table %: 73%
Symmetry: Very good
Polish: Very good
Girdle: Extremely thin to slightly thick
Culet: None
Fluorescence: Strong blue
Measurements: 7.16x7.10x4.87 mm
Length/width ratio: 1.01

Please tell me this is not specs for a round stone.

 

[XChick03]

The table/depth looks a little off to me. If its a princess, which would be my guess, the depth should be higher than the table. Princess that aren''t deep enough don''t perform as well, from what I''ve learned here. And if its a round, the measurements should be more like 8.2x8.20 for a 2 ct.

 

[researcher]

As was mentioned, this stone (if it''s a princess) is most likely not deep enough for the table. A simple (yet not always true) rule is to look for a stone with a depth that is greater than the table. I personally prefer stones with depths in the low-mid 70''s and tables in the mid/high 60''s-low 70''s. Also, watch that girdle! Look for stones that are TN, TN-M, M, TN-STK, M-STK, STK, M-TK, or STK-TK. Avoid stones with extremely thin or thick girdles as they are prone to chipping or hide a lot of the stone''s weight in the middle.

 

[Gonzodogg]

Unless SIZE is you main focus, I would pass on this stone.