feedback please on this diamond

[windowshopper]

possibly putting together a diamond pendant--how does this diamond look --I know NOTHING about rounds:

AGS-6248707
Price: $10,850.00
Report: AGS
Shape: A Cut Above H&A
Carat: 1.081
Color: D
Clarity: VS1
Depth: 60.7
Table: 56
Crown Angle: 34.9
Crown %: 15.4
Pavilion Angle: 40.9
Pavilion %: 43.2
Girdle: Thin to Medium Faceted
Polish: Ideal
Symmetry: Ideal
Culet: Pointed
Fluorescence: Negligible
Measurements: 6.66-6.68X4.05

 

[strmrdr]

typical ACA. kicken
Is it newline or classic?

hint: newline is side to side red in the ideal-scope image.

 

[Mara]

very nice numbers....and as an ACA i'm sure it's beautiful!

as a budget cut-lovin' shopper, i have to ask...is there a reason you are going for a D pendant? 10k for a pendant...

 

[valeria101]

Nice, of course

Why not match the shape of the ring? Just curious.

 

[windowshopper]

Date: 11/28/2005 1:14:16 AM
Author: strmrdr
typical ACA. kicken
Is it newline or classic?

hint: newline is side to side red in the ideal-scope image.

greek to me? please clarify

 

[windowshopper]

Date: 11/28/2005 1:31:04 AM
Author: Mara
very nice numbers....and as an ACA i''m sure it''s beautiful!

as a budget cut-lovin'' shopper, i have to ask...is there a reason you are going for a D pendant? 10k for a pendant...

actually --it was the only one i could find that had the numbers i plugged in...........figured i go with an F to keep it colorless

 

[windowshopper]

you mean my ring? -i cant see an EC as a pendant..........

 

[valeria101]

Date: 11/28/2005 8:02:06 AM
Author: windowshopper
you mean my ring? -i cant see an EC as a pendant..........

Yes... an EC cut, perhaps square?

Do you dislike them as pendants and haven't tried? Emerald cut diamonds only don't work with ketchup as far as I am concerned - hence the Q.

Simple stuff..

And some obvious:

 

[windowshopper]

hmmmmmmmmm dont know. maybe a square but it just doesnt look right--even your picture --to me that is. I could see however a super high crowned octagon................or asscher maybe

 

[valeria101]

Date: 11/28/2005 8:33:34 AM
Author: windowshopper
hmmmmmmmmm dont know. maybe a square but it just doesnt look right--even your picture --to me that is. I could see however a super high crowned octagon................or asscher maybe

Ok...

The thing attached below might just be redundant, but it was done while you were writing the comment and keeps screaming 'post me'

That super fine round is an obvious choice, of course.

 

[windowshopper]

okay now thats something.........who, what , where-----------?

 

[valeria101]

Date: 11/28/2005 9:00:41 AM
Author: windowshopper


okay now thats something.........


who, LINK




what , the little note on the bottom of the picture says it is a drawing... To have it look like that the diamonds should be step cuts with small corner breaks (more square than octagonal).


where-----------?

good question...

 

[windowshopper]

Date: 11/28/2005 1:01:14 AM
Author:windowshopper
possibly putting together a diamond pendant--how does this diamond look --I know NOTHING about rounds:

AGS-6248707
Price: $10,850.00
Report: AGS
Shape: A Cut Above H&A
Carat: 1.081
Color: D
Clarity: VS1
Depth: 60.7
Table: 56
Crown Angle: 34.9
Crown %: 15.4
Pavilion Angle: 40.9
Pavilion %: 43.2
Girdle: Thin to Medium Faceted
Polish: Ideal
Symmetry: Ideal
Culet: Pointed
Fluorescence: Negligible
Measurements: 6.66-6.68X4.05

how does one input these numbers into one of the calculation charts for idea on overall spread , quality etc

 

[valeria101]

You mean this?

The input page is THIS of course, and the result... HCA 1.7.

 

[windowshopper]

what does 1.7 mean?

 

[windowshopper]

what is the best number--i really dont get this "round" stuff!

 

[valeria101]

Date: 11/29/2005 9:28:55 AM
Author: windowshopper


what is the best number--

On the hCA, anyhting under 2 is supposed to be great. There is no best because it is not perfectly precise.
You already have more info on this stone (with H&A thing) than the HCA can tell, Not needed.

Some say HCA=1 is a sweetie, but I suspect that is just because the number falls in the middle of the recommended 0-2 interval and sounds ''special''.


i really dont get this ''round'' stuff!

But you''ve got a great stone picked up.

How about THIS? You could have a pair too.

 

[windowshopper]

well i dont want a pair but i like the price! is a very thin girdle bad on one of these?

 

[valeria101]

Date: 11/29/2005 10:02:16 AM
Author: windowshopper
well i dont want a pair but i like the price! is a very thin girdle bad on one of these?

No, not really. Unless you want it studded into the bottom of a stiletto heel instead of a pendant

There''s allot to choose from though and you can surely have one without.

 

[windowshopper]

Date: 11/29/2005 10:12:00 AM
Author: valeria101

Date: 11/29/2005 10:02:16 AM
Author: windowshopper
well i dont want a pair but i like the price! is a very thin girdle bad on one of these?

No, not really. Unless you want it studded into the bottom of a stiletto heel instead of a pendant

There''s allot to choose from though and you can surely have one without.

how did you know!???????????