denverboy
Shiny_Rock
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2008
- Messages
- 222
Ering - http://cgi.ebay.com/EDWARDIAN-STYLE-DIAMOND-PLATINUM-5-5mm-RING-MOUNTING_W0QQitemZ5023418017QQihZ016QQcategoryZ52603QQrdZ1QQssPageNameZWD1VQQcmdZViewItemQQ_trksidZp1638Q2em118Q2el1247
http://www.faycullen.com/ring_settings/500/517md-kaitlyn.html
Wedding band - http://www.whiteflash.com/pimg/jewelry/gi_576_f.jpg
mainly I'm wondering about the basic style of each ring. I know one is more antique and one is a little more modern, but focus on the main features of each - The Ering has diamonds facing the "front" and "back" along the shank, while the wedding band just has the diamonds facing "up". And if they are worn together that will mean 2 things
1) b/c of the shape of the Ering, they won't be flush against each other, there will have to be some gap
2) The diamonds facing "front/back" on one side of the ring will mostly be hidden since the wedding band would pretty much hide them. But I guess this would happen either way no matter what the style of the wedding band was.
So considering those things, do YOU think the basic styles match, or not?
http://www.faycullen.com/ring_settings/500/517md-kaitlyn.html
Wedding band - http://www.whiteflash.com/pimg/jewelry/gi_576_f.jpg
mainly I'm wondering about the basic style of each ring. I know one is more antique and one is a little more modern, but focus on the main features of each - The Ering has diamonds facing the "front" and "back" along the shank, while the wedding band just has the diamonds facing "up". And if they are worn together that will mean 2 things
1) b/c of the shape of the Ering, they won't be flush against each other, there will have to be some gap
2) The diamonds facing "front/back" on one side of the ring will mostly be hidden since the wedding band would pretty much hide them. But I guess this would happen either way no matter what the style of the wedding band was.
So considering those things, do YOU think the basic styles match, or not?