winternight
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2006
- Messages
- 887
diamondseeker2006|1328495226|3119872 said:winternight, I will admit that what actually upset me on this thread was your very direct statement accusing people at GOG of lying and deliberately misleading you. I have known Jonathan for almost 6 years now, and I know that there is nothing further from the truth. He doesn't do business that way because that is not who he is. I am sure he isn't perfect and can make a mistake like the rest of us. But he is as honest as they come and it did really make me upset to read what you wrote because I am sure it hurt him (and no, I did not alert him to this thread if that is what you're thinking). It would not have bothered me for you to say that you got a stone one time from GOG that was I1, and they told you it was eyeclean to them but it was not to you, and you were unhappy to have the inconvenience of returning it.
I never talked directly to the owner of GOG prior to purchasing the stone. I already said that my word choice was regretable, but I will stand by what I've said regarding the information asked for vs. information received. I did not get the material information I requested to make an informed choice. For the 5th, 6th? time it wasn't just about the stone being eye clean or not it was also that I asked about inclusions and wasn't told about a surface reaching feather. Scratch on the diamond. And GOG defined eye clean to them as 3 inches. I didn't find that to be the case either.
That's great that *you* have had good experiences with GOG. I didn't.