Check these specs

[pwings]

2.07 G si2 eye clean from the top
8.22-8.26x5.06
AGS ideal 0
pol sym prop ; id, id, id
''04 cert no light perfomance
tbl-56
depth-61.5
crw-34.8
pav-40.9
culet-none
flr-negligible
hca- 1.8 ex,vg,vg,vg
gemex-high, very high, high

What do you guys think? Is this enough bling? Am I being too picky if I wanted an HCA of 0 ex,ex,ex,ex and a gem ex of very high, very high, very high? Also, what do you think this stone should be priced at?

 

[belle]

Date: 4/9/2006 12:34:33 AM
Author:pwings
2.07 G si2 eye clean from the top
8.22-8.26x5.06
AGS ideal 0
pol sym prop ; id, id, id
''04 cert no light perfomance
tbl-56
depth-61.5
crw-34.8
pav-40.9
culet-none
flr-negligible
hca- 1.8 ex,vg,vg,vg
gemex-high, very high, high

What do you guys think?

should be quite nice

Am I being too picky if I wanted an HCA of 0 ex,ex,ex,ex and a gem ex of very high, very high, very high?

picky?...no, totally unrealistic.
a lower hca score does not mean a better diamond in any way shape or form and while getting a ''0'' is not mathmatically impossible, it is not likely. the extreme possible combination of angles needed to produce such a score would not likely be appealing to the eye. likewise having ''very high'' everything on gem ex does not guarantee a diamond that is appealing to everyone. having such a score only means that the diamond meets the metric outlined to score ''very high'' on gemex.

 

[Garry H (Cut Nut)]

You are asking too much of HCA.

It should be a very nice stone

 

[pwings]

Thanks guys. What about pricing on this stone, what do you guys think?