I'm trying to decide between two diamonds.
The first is quoted at $7177:
http://www.gia.edu/cs/Satellite?reportno=7191791295&c=Page&childpagename=GIA%2FPage%2FReportCheck&pagename=GIA%2FDispatcher&cid=1355954554547
The second is quoted at $8440:
http://www.gia.edu/cs/Satellite?reportno=5161053915&childpagename=GIA%2FPage%2FReportCheck&pagename=GIA%2FDispatcher&c=Page&cid=1355954554547
They both have similar table and depth percentages, the same polish and clarity grades.
The first length to width is 1.06 which is more than I wanted, and has higher than desirable fluorescence.
The second seems like it's exactly what I'm looking 1.03 length to width, excellent symmetry and polish, shows great, but is quoted at $1263 more.
My question is does the advantage in symmetry, fluorescence and color = $1263?
Thanks,
Chad
The first is quoted at $7177:
http://www.gia.edu/cs/Satellite?reportno=7191791295&c=Page&childpagename=GIA%2FPage%2FReportCheck&pagename=GIA%2FDispatcher&cid=1355954554547
The second is quoted at $8440:
http://www.gia.edu/cs/Satellite?reportno=5161053915&childpagename=GIA%2FPage%2FReportCheck&pagename=GIA%2FDispatcher&c=Page&cid=1355954554547
They both have similar table and depth percentages, the same polish and clarity grades.
The first length to width is 1.06 which is more than I wanted, and has higher than desirable fluorescence.
The second seems like it's exactly what I'm looking 1.03 length to width, excellent symmetry and polish, shows great, but is quoted at $1263 more.
My question is does the advantage in symmetry, fluorescence and color = $1263?
Thanks,
Chad