Hi there,
I am currently shopping for a diamond for my girlfriend''s ering and am still learning. I came across this stone and am not necessarily interested in buying it, but I would appreciate your input. Here are the specs:
1.76 Round
I
SI1
Depth: 58.3%
Table: 57%
Crown Angle: 31.3
Pav Angle: 40.9
Symmetry: VG
Polish: VG
Very thin to Medium Girdle
Culet: V. Small .0.9
At first glance, this looks like a shallow stone- no very well cut. However, when I input the numbers into the HCA, it scored a 0.7 (Excellent in all categories). In the DIY cut adviser, the stone is a 2B. Why does this stone score so well on the HCA? Even though it''s cut on the shallow side, will be a good performer because of the good score on the HCA?
I am currently shopping for a diamond for my girlfriend''s ering and am still learning. I came across this stone and am not necessarily interested in buying it, but I would appreciate your input. Here are the specs:
1.76 Round
I
SI1
Depth: 58.3%
Table: 57%
Crown Angle: 31.3
Pav Angle: 40.9
Symmetry: VG
Polish: VG
Very thin to Medium Girdle
Culet: V. Small .0.9
At first glance, this looks like a shallow stone- no very well cut. However, when I input the numbers into the HCA, it scored a 0.7 (Excellent in all categories). In the DIY cut adviser, the stone is a 2B. Why does this stone score so well on the HCA? Even though it''s cut on the shallow side, will be a good performer because of the good score on the HCA?