Dave, but you''ve misread my post. I didn''t mean to imply that you were disrespecting anyone, I meant that those B&M jewellers who react to customers in the ways I described were disrespecting them. You were saying that certain types of sales behaviour wouldn''t put money in their accounts and I was trying to point out that this kind of behaviour (which I''ve personally experienced in certain B&M stores) wouldn''t either.Date: 2/9/2005 12:35:22 PM
Author: crankydave
Bagpuss,Date: 2/9/2005 10:39:50 AM
Author: Bagpuss
Why would any vendor not having the results to the above, or the abilty to provide them, want to enter into a discussion about them? Knowing what these things are and be able to provide the results are two entirely different things. Why would any vendor want to tell a potential customer to go to a competitor that uses a different technology or more than they do? I''ll venture a guess and say that the first sales associate that did this would be looking for new employment in short order. I don''t forsee all vendors becoming more like labs in the near future. Quote CD
If a store doesn''t have the info I want and doesn''t want to get it for me, fine, I''ll go elsewhere. Trying to hide the fact that they''re not able (or willing for whatever reason) to deal with me on my terms, by telling me that I don''t know what I''m talking about or telling straightforward lies or by trying to put me down is what I object to. All these things have happened to me with so-called ''traditional'' jewellers. Do they really think that customers are going to put up with that?
Dissing your (wealthy) customers is not exactly going to put money in your bank account either.
Please do not put words in my mouth. I don''t know where you''re finding in the comments or questions I pose that I think it''s OK to diss anyone. I''ve suggested nothing of the sort. Quite frankly how much money any customer has is of zero concern to me and to suggest such is clearly wrong and insulting.
Paul,
More and more vendors are working with retailers of all fashions to provide additional information. The wheels of change turn slowly. If figures that Leonid referred to are accurate, about 1% of diamond sales are via online vendors. These are the vendors typically providing and encouraging folks to use, the most technical infomation. This leaves billions of dollars of stones that account for 99% of the sales without all the additional information. Could you provide any type of figure or insight as to what it would cost to re-evalute the billions of dollars of stones?
Dave
"The article in today's NYT quotes internet sales as 2% of the market now. Discount reatailers as 10% up from 6% in 1999, Department stores I forget, but around 20% and gaining, and traditional jewelers as 36% down from 44%.
You so remind me of my dh - loves to play devil''s advocate with me, especially when I don''t realise that he''s doing it!Date: 2/9/2005 38:57 PM
Author: crankydave
We never did disagree on that. We just took the ''scenic route'' figuring it out!Date: 2/9/2005 36:36 PM
Author: Bagpuss
No store is worthy of anyones business if they are treating their clients badly. We do agree putting customers down is not what to do. CrankyDave
I''m glad that we agree at last!
Dave
True, but having been a cut nut from way back (not a super looper douper cut freak), cut is the most pleasing aspect of a stone. Selling a stone sight unseen with a pleasing cut is far more likely to be accepted than rejected - hence the reason for internet vendors to have more focus on it. For the most part, it''s what the eye sees - provided the stone isn''t clouded with junk or too yellowy looking.Date: 2/10/2005 9:21:18 AM
Author: Feydakin
As I said earlier, many internet vendors worked very hard to differentiate themselves in just this way.. I think that things like Sarin and the Idealscope and even the HCA calculator have obviously been developed as a response to the needs of the internet vendors.. I can count the B&M vendors in our area that have Ideal Scopes in the showroom on one finger.. But with the net, since you can''t hold the stone in your hands, you need some way to explain what it is through text and 2D pictures, those two things do that very well..Date: 2/10/2005 12:119 AM
Author: Garry H (Cut Nut)
It is interesting that cut became the most important factor in internet diamonds since it is the one thing that can not be ''seen'' online.
The ''net vendors have done a wonderful job of marketing what they had effectively..
Some yes. Some no. Some dissed that I even asked for more information than just color/clarity/size. The jeweler I ended up purchasing from, yes he got cut- ironically a primarily an Estate jeweler - not a trad B&M - he was an owner operator. Any email coorespondence (he would email me stones that may be of interest to call in) included the appropriate information I required - basically the line item table, depth, sym, fluor, etc.Date: 2/10/2005 11:14:47 AM
Author: crankydave
The issue comes down to a couple of things. I don''t need a sarin. Give me the basics - table, depth, sym, mm, - gia stuff, guidance for a GG, & *MY* eyes and I can decide yay or nay. BUT - it seems to me that trad. B&M''s don''t focus on well cut stones because that''s not what''s demanded or where the money really lies. I haven''t found many B&M''s that focus on cut unless they are selling HOF, LK, etc. Maybe this will change. Funny, I have had more cut discussions with estate jewelers than trad B&M''s.
F & I
In your case, were/are the traditional B&M''s able to discuss the ''basics'' with some semblance of credibility or knowledge?
Dave