1950''s Vintage Rings

[Lisa Loves Shiny]

This is an illusion set .33 VS with .20 sides. 14k. I love this setting. Very unique. I got this as an Estate piece in fine condition. I was told it was 1950''s but any one who knows better please educate me. No makers mark.

2nd ring is a .75 tcw VS RB''s in 14K yellow. Same Estate. Very nice. I love estate pieces and these both have a great energy feel to the. Thanks for letting me share.

Lisa

 

[Lisa Loves Shiny]

2nd ring.

 

[Lisa Loves Shiny]

Side view first ring.

 

[joflier]

I really like the 3 stone. What a great find!

I think the illusion setting is working, cuz it looks a lot bigger than .33!! What is the ring size?

 

[LadyAmythyst69]

I especially like the one that looks like a flower. Very unique!

 

[Lisa Loves Shiny]

A 6.75. I am kind of chubby right now and my hands show it. I get to be distracted by the sparkle. lol

 

[joflier]

Date: 12/13/2007 5:55:14 PM
Author: LisaRN
A 6.75. I am kind of chubby right now and my hands show it. I get to be distracted by the sparkle. lol

ppphhhhh....whatever! Your fingers don't look chubby. I'm a 7 and I figured that was an avg size until i discovered PS.

HOORAY for the chubby fingers!!!!!!

 

[Tacori E-ring]

They are both beautiful. The center of the 3 stone looks huge in that setting!

 

[Skippy123]

Beautiful rings

 

[Diamond*Dana]

They are gorgeous, congratulations on bringing them home with you! That illusion setting really does make the stone look big, love it!

 

[jewelerman]

Lisa RN,
I think that the first ring with the miracle head mount is 1950s to mid-sixties.The second is in my opinion not from the 1950s but is a re-mount ring from the mid 1980s through the early 1990s.The second style of mounting was a popular choice of style for those people who went to re-mounting events and had their diamonds re-set while they waited.

 

[04diamond<3]

I love that illusion setting!!!!!!!!!

 

[Deelight]

Ohhhh I like those both especially the flower one

That definitely looks larger then .33

Beautiful sparklies

 

[Maisie]

What lovely rings. Well done on finding two lovely pieces!

 

[littledebbie]

The flower ring is pretty!

 

[Catmom]

Very, very pretty. Congrats!!!

 

[dearheart]

They are both so lovely! I love vintage pieces, too.

 

[omieluv]

I really like your rings Lisa! The flower ring is unique and the 3-stone ring is so pretty. You are a very fortunate lady!

 

[Lisa Loves Shiny]

Date: 12/14/2007 2:02:04 AM
Author: jewelerman
Lisa RN,
I think that the first ring with the miracle head mount is 1950s to mid-sixties.The second is in my opinion not from the 1950s but is a re-mount ring from the mid 1980s through the early 1990s.The second style of mounting was a popular choice of style for those people who went to re-mounting events and had their diamonds re-set while they waited.

By second ring you mean the flower style- yes? I find that very interesting.

Thanks for the input.

Also thanks to everyone for the nice comments and for letting me share. I love sparklies!

Lisa

 

[lumpkin]

They are all beautiful, but boy that three stone is amazing! I love the proportions of it -- it''s a very graceful ring. Very pretty. And, yes, looks a lot larger than .33. And you do NOT have chubby hands!

 

[Fred333]

I really like the flower ring.