Hand pics from LizzyD...finally
- Thread starter lizzyd
- Start date
- Status
msdarlinjoy
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2004
- Messages
- 1,269
Hi Lizzy ~Date: 7/16/2006 11:01:59 PM
Author: mrssalvo
WOW Lizzy, it''s unbelievable. WF did a great job on the setting too. I can''t wait for pics with the wedding bands
Goodness! I predict some fender benders are gonna happen due to the 3-beams of light shooting people in the eye while driving!
What a sparkler.
Ditto to WF
Have a wonderful day!
Cehrabehra
Super_Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2006
- Messages
- 11,071
CONGRATS!!!! Nicely done 
It''s beautiful
It''s beautiful 
Lynn B
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- May 9, 2004
- Messages
- 5,609
Well, OK... that''s it. I am taking my ball and going home! There is just NO WAY I can keep up!!!
Seriously, it is GORGEOUS! HUGE and gorgeous!!! And did I mention HUGE??!! Ohmyword, girl, I suppose DSS is always a possibility, but I think you have staved it off for a few decades at LEAST!!!
The ring looks beautiful and so "at home" on your hand. It is beautiful, graceful, elegant and so "flowing". And the diamonds... well, simply fantastic. Eye candy at its finest!
I LOVE photo #9!
Congratulations!
Seriously, it is GORGEOUS! HUGE and gorgeous!!! And did I mention HUGE??!! Ohmyword, girl, I suppose DSS is always a possibility, but I think you have staved it off for a few decades at LEAST!!!
The ring looks beautiful and so "at home" on your hand. It is beautiful, graceful, elegant and so "flowing". And the diamonds... well, simply fantastic. Eye candy at its finest!
I LOVE photo #9!
Congratulations!
BeaudryBabe
Shiny_Rock
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2005
- Messages
- 292
lizzy, it is absolutely amazing, WOWZA! Enjoy, it is beautiful.
Tacori E-ring
Super_Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2005
- Messages
- 20,041
That is one HUGE and BEAUTIFUL three stone ring. Can''t wait to see more pictures!
Hi Everybody,
Thanks for all of your nice comments!!! I''m in serious love with this ring. I can''t stop looking at it (or photographing it!) I can''t remember who asked, but the specs for all of the stones are on pg 1 of this thread.
Also, whoever asked about calling WF for a quote, please, go right ahead. When I talked to Lesley and told her what I was looking for, and showed her some pics, she knew exactly what I was talking about. Whiteflash has done this setting on a few (several?) occassions. The closest you could get in a stock setting I think would probably be the A. Jaffe, as far as I have been able to tell.
Now, you guys are gonna laugh, but I have a 5 stone diamond wedding band and a 2mm platinum comfort fit wedding band that I wear as a spacer. I''ve included a couple of pics with them all together. It''s actially really comfortable that way. What do you all think?
More pics to follow.
Best,
LizzyD
Thanks for all of your nice comments!!! I''m in serious love with this ring. I can''t stop looking at it (or photographing it!) I can''t remember who asked, but the specs for all of the stones are on pg 1 of this thread.
Also, whoever asked about calling WF for a quote, please, go right ahead. When I talked to Lesley and told her what I was looking for, and showed her some pics, she knew exactly what I was talking about. Whiteflash has done this setting on a few (several?) occassions. The closest you could get in a stock setting I think would probably be the A. Jaffe, as far as I have been able to tell.
Now, you guys are gonna laugh, but I have a 5 stone diamond wedding band and a 2mm platinum comfort fit wedding band that I wear as a spacer. I''ve included a couple of pics with them all together. It''s actially really comfortable that way. What do you all think?
More pics to follow.
Best,
LizzyD
This was posted by LizzyD when she first got the ring:
Center stone:
3.11ct, ACA, H, VS2
depth 61.0
table 55.0
ca 34.2
pa 40.9
polish/symm ID/ID
Flour - Negl.
9.43 x 9.46 x 5.76mm
HCA - Ex/Ex/Vg/Vg = 1.2 Ex
Side stone #1:
ACA, 1.116ct, J, SI2, eye clean
depth 60.4
table 57
ca 34.6
pa 40.7
polish/symm ID/ID
Flour - Medium blue
6.71 x 6.73 x 4.06mm
HCA - Ex/Ex/Ex/Vg = 1.0 Ex
and Side Stone #2:
ACA, 1.144ct, J, SI2, eye clean
depth 61.8
table 55.8
ca 34.8
pa 40.8
polish/symm ID/ID
Flour - Negl.
6.69 x 6.72 x 4.15mm
HCA - Ex/Ex/Ex/Vg = 1.5 Ex
Center stone:
3.11ct, ACA, H, VS2
depth 61.0
table 55.0
ca 34.2
pa 40.9
polish/symm ID/ID
Flour - Negl.
9.43 x 9.46 x 5.76mm
HCA - Ex/Ex/Vg/Vg = 1.2 Ex
Side stone #1:
ACA, 1.116ct, J, SI2, eye clean
depth 60.4
table 57
ca 34.6
pa 40.7
polish/symm ID/ID
Flour - Medium blue
6.71 x 6.73 x 4.06mm
HCA - Ex/Ex/Ex/Vg = 1.0 Ex
and Side Stone #2:
ACA, 1.144ct, J, SI2, eye clean
depth 61.8
table 55.8
ca 34.8
pa 40.8
polish/symm ID/ID
Flour - Negl.
6.69 x 6.72 x 4.15mm
HCA - Ex/Ex/Ex/Vg = 1.5 Ex
Cehrabehra
Super_Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2006
- Messages
- 11,071
I swear... if those three merged into one, it would burst! I like it JUST the way it is - it''s like a ménages à trois - you nailed it scarlet! lol!
Allisonfaye
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2004
- Messages
- 1,456
Oh, leave the kids at camp. J/K
That''s stunning. I have toyed around with a three stone of about that size range. I love it! Congratulations.
That''s stunning. I have toyed around with a three stone of about that size range. I love it! Congratulations.
- Status
300x240.png)