taking_the_plunge
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2007
- Messages
- 30
Yes, this is the biggest difference in my opinion, but it''s hard to tell from the angle of the inspiration piece how big that polished part of the shank is? What did they say about whether or not the diamonds would go all the way to the sides of the band? This doesn''t seem an easy fix...since there are diamonds set into the sides.Date: 2/12/2007 6:18:27 PM
Author: taking_the_plunge
I agree it is very similar, but my main concern is the size of the polished surface. I specifically asked when I saw the wax model whether or not the diamonds would go all the way to the sides of the band, similar to the picture below. I am disapointed to see that isn''t the case. To me, thats the biggest difference.
That is basically what I said above. I''d definitely have them add the milgrain. That will help reduce the appearance of such wide shiny strips on the shank.Date: 2/12/2007 6:18:27 PM
Author: taking_the_plunge
I agree it is very similar, but my main concern is the size of the polished surface. I specifically asked when I saw the wax model whether or not the diamonds would go all the way to the sides of the band, similar to the picture below. I am disapointed to see that isn''t the case. To me, thats the biggest difference.
Date: 2/12/2007 6:11:38 PM
Author: diamondseeker2006
It''s missing the milgrain on the top of the shank. It needs it, in my opinion, to reflect the style of the example. And there is a little too much metal on the shank as well.
Date: 2/12/2007 6:40:02 PM
Author: diamondseeker2006
Date: 2/12/2007 6:18:27 PM
Author: taking_the_plunge
I agree it is very similar, but my main concern is the size of the polished surface. I specifically asked when I saw the wax model whether or not the diamonds would go all the way to the sides of the band, similar to the picture below. I am disapointed to see that isn''t the case. To me, thats the biggest difference.
That is basically what I said above. I''d definitely have them add the milgrain. That will help reduce the appearance of such wide shiny strips on the shank.
I am very glad to hear this, because there was no way to fix that ring to be what you wanted. I am glad that they realized the error and are remaking the ring. Definitely better to get it done the way you want it, even though it requires waiting.Date: 2/12/2007 6:50:08 PM
Author: taking_the_plunge
I spoke with WF and they agreed to the major differences between the rings, in particular, the size of the polished surfaces on the shank. When we spoke on the phone, we were talking about different things, which led to the confusion. I sent WF a photoshopped picture showing the areas of concern and they agreed to remake the ring. It will put me back a few more weeks but I''d rather do it right and only get it shipped once. I can say that they have been very helpful and responsive.
Yes it''s true...even in person when doing my custom halo I thought I was getting my point across but it turned out I wasn''t, the first time around. It''s nice to work with a jeweler who understands that communication has broken down and is willing to do what''s right to fix it. Definitely keep us posted!Date: 2/12/2007 8:25:52 PM
Author: taking_the_plunge
In the end, we were talking about 2 different features of the ring when I voiced my original concerns. Just shows how tough it is to do some things over the phone.
I agree, too. All in all it is pretty close. And a very pretty ring and stone I might add!Date: 2/12/2007 6:11:38 PM
Author: diamondseeker2006
It''s missing the milgrain on the top of the shank. It needs it, in my opinion, to reflect the style of the example. And there is a little too much metal on the shank as well.
WOW that''s really good of them. Of course you want it done the way you want it done. Can''t wait to see some hand shots.Date: 2/12/2007 6:50:08 PM
Author: taking_the_plunge
I spoke with WF and they agreed to the major differences between the rings, in particular, the size of the polished surfaces on the shank. When we spoke on the phone, we were talking about different things, which led to the confusion. I sent WF a photoshopped picture showing the areas of concern and they agreed to remake the ring. It will put me back a few more weeks but I''d rather do it right and only get it shipped once. I can say that they have been very helpful and responsive.
Yep. The custom one isn''t as delicate as the original. It''s a chunkier interpretation.Date: 2/12/2007 6:18:27 PM
Author: taking_the_plunge
I agree it is very similar, but my main concern is the size of the polished surface. I specifically asked when I saw the wax model whether or not the diamonds would go all the way to the sides of the band, similar to the picture below. I am disapointed to see that isn''t the case. To me, thats the biggest difference.
Here are the updated wax photos of the ring from WF. They used their new cadcam machine to design the ring and carve the wax based off the image. I''m very pleased with the outcome. Apart from the prongs (which they will be smoothing out during finishing) I think it looks great. I''ve be more than satisfied with the support from WF. Looking forward to posting the final product.