- Joined
- May 22, 2002
- Messages
- 1,915
Hi All,
In trying to help my brother come up with an e-ring/wedding band combination I''ve been trying to read about the melee sizes & recognizing what sizes the designers use. David is interested in a Channel set band, much like a Scott Kay he likes & we figure the melee to be about 2pt each. He wants the band farily thin, 2.5mm & said he would like 3pt melee because the stones look smushed in the channel setting. His center stone will be around .80ish. The balance between his center stone & the sidestones seem to blend well.
What I''ve also come to notice on the board as more memebers upgrade, is that they too have been keeping their melee down to 2 & 3pts as well. What reason are you guys keeping the sidestones so small? I recall a PS member JuliaJulia (I think) & she had a ring made from Bostonian(?) anyway, her melee were 7 pts each & they still looked ok with her large center.
- Is there a specific reason to keep the melee that small?
- Could it be just simply the smaller stones are more appealing to the eye?
- Affordability?
Wondering if those with 2+ ct. stone would go with 5pt mellee? Would you go to 5pt if money were not a consideration? Or if your husband didnt care. LOL
Thanks guys,
Just curious about whats going on with the trends out there.
Judy
**sorry for any errors. I just got off of night shift & am really too tired to be typing, but too wired to go to sleep** Leonid, dont shut down the forum tonight or tomorow night, I am working. LOL The long weekends are slow, I could catch up on my reading. LOL
In trying to help my brother come up with an e-ring/wedding band combination I''ve been trying to read about the melee sizes & recognizing what sizes the designers use. David is interested in a Channel set band, much like a Scott Kay he likes & we figure the melee to be about 2pt each. He wants the band farily thin, 2.5mm & said he would like 3pt melee because the stones look smushed in the channel setting. His center stone will be around .80ish. The balance between his center stone & the sidestones seem to blend well.
What I''ve also come to notice on the board as more memebers upgrade, is that they too have been keeping their melee down to 2 & 3pts as well. What reason are you guys keeping the sidestones so small? I recall a PS member JuliaJulia (I think) & she had a ring made from Bostonian(?) anyway, her melee were 7 pts each & they still looked ok with her large center.
- Is there a specific reason to keep the melee that small?
- Could it be just simply the smaller stones are more appealing to the eye?
- Affordability?
Wondering if those with 2+ ct. stone would go with 5pt mellee? Would you go to 5pt if money were not a consideration? Or if your husband didnt care. LOL
Thanks guys,
Just curious about whats going on with the trends out there.
Judy
**sorry for any errors. I just got off of night shift & am really too tired to be typing, but too wired to go to sleep** Leonid, dont shut down the forum tonight or tomorow night, I am working. LOL The long weekends are slow, I could catch up on my reading. LOL