1.0ct AVCs - please help choosing between 2

[colette]

Hi all,

I've narrowed down my choice to two GOG AVC's that are 1.0 ct. They are very similar but didn't know if anyone could help me choose between the two. I already put the one that has slighter larger dimensions on hold (#902 - and the larger spread is my only motivation. They are both Ideal cut, L, VS2 and about $100 difference in price. The one I put on hold has excellent polish/symmetry and the other, which is also more square, has ideal polish and symmetry. I really don't think the off square will bother me, but didn't know if the ASET, lab report or anything else should point me toward #8982.

http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/9028/

http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/8982/

They are diamonds 2 and 4 in this attachment, which was to compare the square to the slightly rectangular cuts:


Thank you for any help you can provide in my decision!

 

[slg47]

I would go with the one with larger dimensions.

 

[farmer gal]

I would pick the first one

 

[fridays_child]

I'd also pick the stone with larger dimesions - I happen to like its shape better. If you prefer the maltese cross pattern thingy on one of them, I would choose that one. You'll be staring at it a lot From looking at the additional info, it seems like they would perform pretty much the same - great.

 

[colette]

Thank you! I'm going with the 1st one then!