New Mahenge Spinel question

[Lovinggems]

I reserved this emerald cut spinel, it's 8.3 x 6.2mm, do you think it's too small or short for these types of setting?

 

[Lovinggems]

.

 

[Lovinggems]

.

 

[Liane]

I think it''s perfect, but 7 to 9 mm is my sweet spot so naturally I''m going to think that.

Some of it depends on your finger size and proportions (both with your fingers and with the other stones in the setting) but really I think those dimensions should be just right. If the central stone were much bigger then the rest of the setting might look too crowded or overwhelming, IMO.

 

[Lovinggems]

Date: 12/2/2009 4:56:24 AM
Author: Liane
I think it''s perfect, but 7 to 9 mm is my sweet spot so naturally I''m going to think that.

Some of it depends on your finger size and proportions (both with your fingers and with the other stones in the setting) but really I think those dimensions should be just right. If the central stone were much bigger then the rest of the setting might look too crowded or overwhelming, IMO.

My finger size is around 5, I was thinking if I should hold out and wait for a longer and slightly wider one, like the 3 ct emerald cut that''s in your temporary care now.

 

[Lady_Disdain]

I think it will look great. I love the colour and shape - a very nicely don emerald cut.

 

[ma re]

These styles with multiple step sides probably work so well because the center stones are slightly more elongated. Therefore I think the stone you posted would work better if it would have only one step cut on each side as it''s already a wide EC.

But another idea comes to mind that you might like - if the shank would taper in width (kind of like with a split shank, but not as much) and if the step cut stones of varying sizes would be channel set in it - graduating in size of course. It would work with a wider stone and still look very similar to the style you''re after. Kind of like THIS, but with fewer sides (which increase in size towards the center) and without rows of round melee on the edges.

 

[Lovinggems]

Date: 12/2/2009 5:59:22 AM
Author: ma re
These styles with multiple step sides probably work so well because the center stones are slightly more elongated. Therefore I think the stone you posted would work better if it would have only one step cut on each side as it''s already a wide EC.

But another idea comes to mind that you might like - if the shank would taper in width (kind of like with a split shank, but not as much) and if the step cut stones of varying sizes would be channel set in it - graduating in size of course. It would work with a wider stone and still look very similar to the style you''re after. Kind of like THIS, but with fewer sides (which increase in size towards the center) and without rows of round melee on the edges.

Thanks for your suggestion Mr MaRe and thanks for your reply LD.

 

[chrono]

The first one with 2 sidestones on each side might work. It probably doesn’t have enough height to work with the second picture with 3 sidestones on each side. Both are very nice designs for a step cut center stone.

 

[cellentani]

Lovinggems, it''s freaky, but my new Mahenge spinel is exactly that size - 8.3x6.2mm. I like larger stones and wear a size 7, so like you, I was worried about it being too small. However, I think the settings you have posted would look great with that size and would give you terrific finger coverage! You may have already seen them, but I posted some settings on my thread, and I don''t look at them and think, "Gee, my stone looks really small." Of course, if you want to go bigger, let me be the first to enable you, lol!

 

[Stone Hunter]

Nice color on my monitor. And I like the size and the cut.

I think it would work in those settings IF the sizes of the side stones are correct! Congrats!!

 

[T L]

I didn't read all the responses (sneaking on PS at work), but I look at ring jewelry in a different light than just proportions. No matter how small the stone is, how your fingers are, etc. . . if it's an intense to vivid color, it would look great. Stones with strong color saturation, IMO, always look good no matter what the size, and if they're huge, well, that's all the better!! LOL!!

I love that style setting and the telescoping of the baguettes, very art deco inspired look, which I love. Lovely stone, and it will make a gorgeous ring.

 

[Lovinggems]

Chrono, Cell, SH, TL: Thank you for your suggestions and views, I think I''ll get this one, not sure when I''ll be able to set it though but the art deco look will be my top choice.

 

[stepcutnut]

Lovely spinel!!!

I think the settings would look great with your stone of those measurements!

My FLY radiant diamond is about 9x7mm in a similar setting with 2 baguettes on each side and I think setting a stone with close proportions would suit it quit well

 

[LD]

OMG!!! Talk about great minds think alike!!!!

My spinel is with my jeweller being made in this exact same setting

Is yours too small? Well if yours is, then mine definitely is because my spinel is just over 7 x 5 and the sides are 4 x 2, 3 x 1.5!

 

[Lovinggems]

Date: 12/3/2009 2:14:06 PM
Author: LovingDiamonds
OMG!!! Talk about great minds think alike!!!!

My spinel is with my jeweller being made in this exact same setting

Is yours too small? Well if yours is, then mine definitely is because my spinel is just over 7 x 5 and the sides are 4 x 2, 3 x 1.5!

Yes I agree with you absolutely!

Please do post photos when you get your ring back from the jeweller.

 

[mariedtiger]

What a beautiful spinel!

 

[LD]

Date: 12/4/2009 3:45:27 AM
Author: Lovinggems

Date: 12/3/2009 2:14:06 PM
Author: LovingDiamonds
OMG!!! Talk about great minds think alike!!!!

My spinel is with my jeweller being made in this exact same setting

Is yours too small? Well if yours is, then mine definitely is because my spinel is just over 7 x 5 and the sides are 4 x 2, 3 x 1.5!

Yes I agree with you absolutely!

Please do post photos when you get your ring back from the jeweller.

It''s third in line so I''m afraid may not be until after Christmas.

 

[Stone Hunter]

Date: 12/3/2009 7:20:04 AM
Author: Lovinggems
Chrono, Cell, SH, TL: Thank you for your suggestions and views, I think I''ll get this one, not sure when I''ll be able to set it though but the art deco look will be my top choice.

Please post photos of this lovely stone when you get it!!

 

[Lovinggems]

MT thank you!

LD I''m patient.

SH I wish I could, camera is broken

, if fixable it will take a couple of months.

 

[Lovinggems]

I received the spinel yesterday

. The colour is neon, fluro pink, kind of like the colour of a pink highlighter pen when you run over the same place two to three times.

Since it's more of a lively, vibrant colour, I was thinking matching it with princess cut yellow diamonds, like this picture, honest opinions please and do stop me if you think I'm going crazy, the idea is wacky etc.

Apologies for the photo, I don't know how to change it once posted.

 

[Boom]

I love the idea of the yellow diamonds. Vivid pink and vivid yellow, I think it''s a wonderful combination.

The art deco style is a great look too, but I personally would prefer a more elongated emerald shaped stone for that.

 

[T L]

Date: 12/9/2009 7:09:58 AM
Author: Boom
I love the idea of the yellow diamonds. Vivid pink and vivid yellow, I think it''s a wonderful combination.

The art deco style is a great look too, but I personally would prefer a more elongated emerald shaped stone for that.

Ditto. Maybe if you made the princess cut yellows in a vertical stack on each side.

 

[Lovinggems]

Date: 12/9/2009 7:09:58 AM
Author: Boom
I love the idea of the yellow diamonds. Vivid pink and vivid yellow, I think it''s a wonderful combination.

The art deco style is a great look too, but I personally would prefer a more elongated emerald shaped stone for that.

Hi Boom! Thanks for your opinion, it''s much appreciated. Yes I think I need a longer and larger spinel for the telescoping diamond look.

 

[Lovinggems]

Date: 12/9/2009 7:28:02 AM
Author: tourmaline_lover

Date: 12/9/2009 7:09:58 AM
Author: Boom
I love the idea of the yellow diamonds. Vivid pink and vivid yellow, I think it''s a wonderful combination.

The art deco style is a great look too, but I personally would prefer a more elongated emerald shaped stone for that.

Ditto. Maybe if you made the princess cut yellows in a vertical stack on each side.

Thank TL, did you mean like this ring? Although this is still an art deco look.

 

[T L]

Exactly!! Wow, you''re a good mind reader!!

 

[Lovinggems]

Date: 12/9/2009 7:39:11 AM
Author: tourmaline_lover
Exactly!! Wow, you''re a good mind reader!!

I found this gorgeous ring photo a couple of days ago, courtesy of Lady D''s link. I''m not sure how it''ll look in pink and yellow though.

http://www.bentley-skinner.co.uk/

 

[chrono]

Date: 12/9/2009 7:37:05 AM
Author: Lovinggems

Date: 12/9/2009 7:28:02 AM
Author: tourmaline_lover

Date: 12/9/2009 7:09:58 AM
Author: Boom
I love the idea of the yellow diamonds. Vivid pink and vivid yellow, I think it''s a wonderful combination.

The art deco style is a great look too, but I personally would prefer a more elongated emerald shaped stone for that.

Ditto. Maybe if you made the princess cut yellows in a vertical stack on each side.

Thank TL, did you mean like this ring? Although this is still an art deco look.

I love that one!

 

[stepcutnut]

LG-I think it would be a wonderful combo! I have a pair of earrings that are set in all YG with vivid yellow and pink sapphires that are beautiful---I''d say go for it

 

[T L]

Date: 12/9/2009 7:47:33 AM
Author: Lovinggems

Date: 12/9/2009 7:39:11 AM
Author: tourmaline_lover
Exactly!! Wow, you''re a good mind reader!!

I found this gorgeous ring photo a couple of days ago, courtesy of Lady D''s link. I''m not sure how it''ll look in pink and yellow though.

http://www.bentley-skinner.co.uk/

Your link only goes to their home page.