- Joined
- Aug 22, 2012
- Messages
- 7,329
E B|1484956151|4117163 said:redwood66|1484955506|4117152 said:Matata|1484954491|4117141 said:http://www.theatlantic.com/liveblogs/2017/01/live-coverage-of-the-presidential-inauguration/513785/13979/?utm_source=atlfb
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2017/01/20/white-house-website-promotes-melania-trumps-modeling-and-jewelry-line/?utm_term=.a4bde60b55e7
Who the fark cares but snowflakes wanting to cause a stink? So she has a jewelry line? Its not like there is a cart on the .gov site where you can buy it. I don't subscribe to the line that they must lose millions by selling everything that has been their life before this day. Others may, but I have more important issues for them to take care of like getting that nominee on the SC. I am a simple person who has common sense but it seems much more important to be a master of critical thinking while typing on the internet.
A blind trust =/= "selling everything that has been their life before this day." Previous presidents have done it, and so should this one.
Surely you would have felt the same had Hillary also faced these conflicts of interest? That we should make an exception? C'mon, now! You conservatives are supposed to be the staunch defenders of the constitution, Scalia-style. The moving of the goalposts is getting a little exhausting.
Some more on this (it's a conservative columnist...give it a look: https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...es-the-oath-of-office/?utm_term=.442b6e1c51b4)
I was speaking to the Melania article. Trump has issues with this and smarter people than us will work it out. It is interesting that no one here had issues with foreign governments giving money to Clinton Foundation and now they have all dried up. Why? All of this is exhausting here on PS. I am tempted to go away because this is just no fun anymore.