Logan Sapphire
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2003
- Messages
- 2,405
Apparently they are engaged and from the pics I saw, it's a large emerald cut stone. Anyone else have scoop?
minousbijoux|1334355128|3170503 said:Oh Logan, in case of misunderstanding - I am interested in the ring and the bling, just not the couple!
monarch64|1334355759|3170515 said:http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/angelina-jolies-engagement-ring-designer-robert-procop-5-things-you-dont-know-2012134
Here's the first pic I came across. I'll see if there are any more.
Logan Sapphire|1334355698|3170513 said:minousbijoux|1334355128|3170503 said:Oh Logan, in case of misunderstanding - I am interested in the ring and the bling, just not the couple!
No worrie- I'm the same way, though I do find it curious that they took a stand on not marrying until there was marriage equality, so i wonder what changed their minds?
Autumnovember|1334377440|3170722 said:God I can't stand Angelina.
VRBeauty|1334371950|3170672 said:That looks like a Cartier watch Angelina is wearing?
Imdanny|1334365213|3170580 said:BTW, Brad already has a classic Cartier wedding band. I read about that in some magazine.
Then why get so mad?Galateia|1334393421|3170763 said:I really don't give a hoot about the people involved, because they aren't people I know personally, but the hypocrisy in public opinion about them gets my goat.
I, for one, am totally sick of people dissing Jolie because of how they met while forgetting the details. I remember reading stuff at the time (before he and Aniston divorced) about their troubled marriage and him wanting kids and she didn't ... and then suddenly people forgot those reports about them being on the rocks over kids and it became "OMG ANGELINA IS AN EVIL HOMEWRECKER" when Aniston herself broke up a 10 year marriage by dating Justin Theroux, which apparently blindsided his common law wife. Where is the outrage that Aniston is just as guilty of being a homewrecker as Jolie is?
And yet, people still love to paint Angelina as an evil vixen and Jennifer as this innocent, blameless victim even though she's done the same thing herself. Moreover, why have people glossed over the trip Pitt and Aniston took near the end where he gave her the ultimatum of kids vs. divorce? If a woman wanted children and her husband refused to have them, would anyone blame her for leaving him and finding someone else who did?
I respect what Jolie and Pitt have done with their fame and fortune. It's certainly more worthwhile than what Aniston has done with hers. Moreover, they took a stance against marriage in protest of gay marriage bans, and now they are acquiescing to what their children want. How is it that people can remain so spiteful towards them?
Galateia|1334393421|3170763 said:I really don't give a hoot about the people involved, because they aren't people I know personally, but the hypocrisy in public opinion about them gets my goat.
I, for one, am totally sick of people dissing Jolie because of how they met while forgetting the details. I remember reading stuff at the time (before he and Aniston divorced) about their troubled marriage and him wanting kids and she didn't ... and then suddenly people forgot those reports about them being on the rocks over kids and it became "OMG ANGELINA IS AN EVIL HOMEWRECKER" when Aniston herself broke up a 10 year marriage by dating Justin Theroux, which apparently blindsided his common law wife. Where is the outrage that Aniston is just as guilty of being a homewrecker as Jolie is?
And yet, people still love to paint Angelina as an evil vixen and Jennifer as this innocent, blameless victim even though she's done the same thing herself. Moreover, why have people glossed over the trip Pitt and Aniston took near the end where he gave her the ultimatum of kids vs. divorce? If a woman wanted children and her husband refused to have them, would anyone blame her for leaving him and finding someone else who did?
I respect what Jolie and Pitt have done with their fame and fortune. It's certainly more worthwhile than what Aniston has done with hers. Moreover, they took a stance against marriage in protest of gay marriage bans, and now they are acquiescing to what their children want. How is it that people can remain so spiteful towards them?
atp223|1334411829|3170859 said:Is anyone else getting the impression brad had a rough piece of diamond cut to a "unique" cut that was specially designed for Angelina's finger? An article I just read, that I will attempt to re-find and post, mentioned a long table specifically bc of angelinia's "long slender fingers"...I want to see up close pictures of this thing!
atp223|1334411829|3170859 said:Is anyone else getting the impression brad had a rough piece of diamond cut to a "unique" cut that was specially designed for Angelina's finger? An article I just read, that I will attempt to re-find and post, mentioned a long table specifically bc of angelinia's "long slender fingers"...I want to see up close pictures of this thing!
Phdecorate|1334411143|3170854 said:Back to the ring... I heard this morning on the news that it was 6 ct estimated to cost around 250k..took Brad a year of involvement to help design it...
sparklyheart|1334413032|3170865 said:http://surisburnbook.tumblr.com/post/21037104241/diamond-or-not-angelina-jolies-flat-claw-hand-is
Circe|1334355966|3170517 said:monarch64|1334355759|3170515 said:http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/angelina-jolies-engagement-ring-designer-robert-procop-5-things-you-dont-know-2012134
Here's the first pic I came across. I'll see if there are any more.
D'oh - great minds think alike! Just cross-posted. It does indeed look like a big emerald-cut, with a step-cut halo if I'm not mistaken. Can't wait to see close-ups!
ETA: The jeweler's website ... http://www.robertprocop.com/