It seems like the more I educate myself on diamonds, the more jewelers try to debunk all of the technologies you are all suggesting to use to help choose a good diamond. I have been reading the forums for a few days now and feel confident in the replies that you have all shared, especially a few of you who seem to stick out as true professionals.
I realize that a diamond cannot be bought just on the specs in a GIA/AGS certificate, or what the HCA says, but I do understand how these different things can help make a wise educated decision to purchase a diamond which may actually hold more value than the next.
What I don''t get is why the more I seem to learn, the more jewelers try to tell me that lots of this stuff is just more confusion and the truth is in the look of the diamond. Now I understand that, but the truth is that my eye is nowhere near trained to know the differences of what is good, and what is not other than from imperfections, and actual shimmer when comparing diamond to diamond.
So I understand what they are saying when they say buy a diamond that looks the nicest to you, but the truth is that I might not know what the nicest looks like to begin with.
I do not want to spend a ton of cash "just" on what I think looks good, I want to be sure it is also valuable and on the higher end of the diamond charts.
The Ideal-Scope seems to show its benefit with ease, and the HCA seems to be a decent way of figuring out what are workable angles, and what aren''t.
So when the jewelers try to debunk all of these technologies, does anyone feel like they are doing this to "uneducate", or is it an honest statement?
I personally feel it is a little bit of both, but in the end they sure to seem to agree and tell me whatever I want to hear when I am shopping. They also conveniently steer you way from these different technologies and back to the cert grading''s which all seems too reliant on a cert that might not have it all right.
Opinions from the pro''s and regular shoppers and viewers are appreciated and encouraged!
I realize that a diamond cannot be bought just on the specs in a GIA/AGS certificate, or what the HCA says, but I do understand how these different things can help make a wise educated decision to purchase a diamond which may actually hold more value than the next.
What I don''t get is why the more I seem to learn, the more jewelers try to tell me that lots of this stuff is just more confusion and the truth is in the look of the diamond. Now I understand that, but the truth is that my eye is nowhere near trained to know the differences of what is good, and what is not other than from imperfections, and actual shimmer when comparing diamond to diamond.
So I understand what they are saying when they say buy a diamond that looks the nicest to you, but the truth is that I might not know what the nicest looks like to begin with.
I do not want to spend a ton of cash "just" on what I think looks good, I want to be sure it is also valuable and on the higher end of the diamond charts.
The Ideal-Scope seems to show its benefit with ease, and the HCA seems to be a decent way of figuring out what are workable angles, and what aren''t.
So when the jewelers try to debunk all of these technologies, does anyone feel like they are doing this to "uneducate", or is it an honest statement?
I personally feel it is a little bit of both, but in the end they sure to seem to agree and tell me whatever I want to hear when I am shopping. They also conveniently steer you way from these different technologies and back to the cert grading''s which all seems too reliant on a cert that might not have it all right.
Opinions from the pro''s and regular shoppers and viewers are appreciated and encouraged!