shape
carat
color
clarity

Garnet color and tone vs chemical composition

zeolite

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Aug 13, 2008
Messages
619
Gems & Gemology, winter 2011, has an interesting article “Determining garnet composition from magnetic susceptibility and other properties”.

Now before this puts you to sleep, hang in here through the chemical formulas, and I’ll show why this is important.

Individual gemologists, not associated with a Research Laboratory, have 3 tools to give an indication of garnet composition. They are refractive index, specific gravity, and the spectroscope.

Well equipped research labs determine chemical composition by electron microprobe, or EDXRF (energy dispersive x-ray fluorescence)

This article discusses another method, which I won’t even go into here. The important part of this article for me, is that it pictures 28 gem garnets and gives the accurate chemical composition of each. So there is no speculation of what it might be. We know what it is.

I thought of photographing the 28 garnets and picturing here, but that might violate copyrights. So garnet lovers, go out and buy this issue!

Also keep in mind that the most desirable gem garnets are medium to lighter tone, which if well cut, show exceptional brilliance. My personal garnet collection exceeds 70 gems, of which all but two, are in this rare, brighter category.

For my discussion, it helps to know the chemical formula for the 5 main gem garnets:

Pyrope Mg3Al2, Si3O12
Almandite Fe3Al2, Si3O12
Spessartite Mn3Al2, Si3O12

Grossular Ca3Al2, Si3O12
Andradite Ca3Fe2 Si3O12

Although no natural garnets are 100% pure, some examples can approach this. Nearly pure pyrope garnets will approach colorless. The color in red pyrope garnets is almost always due to considerable amounts of iron (Fe, i.e. almandite). In rare cases, trace amounts of chromium (Cr) gives the intense red of chrome pyrope.

Grossular garnets are the closest in the garnet world to being both pure and colorless. Their color is due to iron or rarely Mn2+ (yellow), or vanadium or chromium (green). Andradite is also often light in tone and the source of color is the same as for grossular.
Spessartite garnets will never be colorless, but if high in spessartite content, it can be a medium toned orange. If the spessartite is darker orange, or darker orange red, or darker red, it is because it contains high iron (almandite) content.

The dark color and tone in almandite is not due to trace metals, it is due to the iron in the basic almandite formula.

Here is the importance of the pictures and the color and tone in this article:

You can look at the 14 or so dark toned garnets, and look up their chemical composition. They are all high almandite content.

Now look at the 14 or so lighter toned garnets:

If the garnet is medium pink or lighter pink, it has high pyrope content. There is a rare pink grossular from Mexico, but it is at best translucent.

If the garnet is lighter purple pink, it is rhodolite (pyrope and almandite) but with a much higher pyrope content, which gives the lighter tone.

If it is medium toned fairly pure orange, it has high spessartite content. Orange grossulars tend to have a very strong brown component. Malaya garnets are pyrope-spessartite mixtures. But if the tone is light (a specialty of my garnet collection), the pyrope content will be higher than spessartite.

If it is green, you know it is either grossular or andradite. Refractive index will determine which one it is.

If you have a refractometer, there is more you can learn. Pyrope or grossular tend to have lower refractive index (R.I.): 1.73 or 1.74.
Spessartite and almandite have higher R.I.: 1.80 to 1.82
Andradite is very high: 1.88

After measuring my 70 garnets, I can glance at a new lighter toned unknown garnet, study the color and tone and guess pretty accurately what the R.I. will be. And the R.I. can give a rough estimate of the ratio of two most dominant end members (such as pyrope vs almandite).

But one pure golden garnet in this study shot down my color/tone understanding. I’ve never seen a golden garnet that was anything other than grossular. I’m not counting the yellow-brown Mali (grossular-andradite mixture. Yet this one was 47% pyrope, 46% spessartite, 7% almandite. In other words: malaya. But not orange, it was a pure intense (sapphire golden) color, not grossular (pastel yellow with some brown) color.

So that was my second eureka moment: I recently acquired a very strange intense golden garnet that I classified as grossular, yet the R.I. index was quite high . The intensity of color is nothing like my many yellow grossulars, which are pastel yellow. I thought it was grossular-andradite, but now I’m thinking pyrope-spessartite, as pictured in this G&G report. I need to give it to my friends at GIA Research for analysis.
 

zeolite

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Aug 13, 2008
Messages
619
Colorless grossular garnet, 1.74ct. These are rare beyond belief. This is because iron is everywhere in the earth’s crust, and iron colors most garnets a deep red. This garnet was only possible because a shallow sea covered Tanzania hundreds of millions of year ago. The thick marine deposit of calcium bearing shells excluded the iron. The Ca is part of the basic formula for grossular garnet. This colorless garnet is R.I.=1.732

1wgarn174.jpg
 

zeolite

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Aug 13, 2008
Messages
619
Mali garnet (from Mali, west Africa), 2.95 cts. Malis are usually grossular-andradite mixtures, but this is closer to pure grossular. R.I.=1.742.

2mali295.jpg
 

zeolite

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Aug 13, 2008
Messages
619
Mali garnet, 0.90 cts. This garnet is closer to grossular, and is extremely rare (for Mali) with its intense green color. Malis are usually pastel greenish-yellow, to golden, to rust brown. The seller was certain that it was from Mali, not Tanzania. The R.I.=1.765 also indicates not from Tanzania.

3gmali90.jpg
 

zeolite

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Aug 13, 2008
Messages
619
Tsavorite, 3.04cts. A perfect balance of intense color and yet brilliant. R.I.=1.739.

4tsav304.jpg
 

zeolite

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Aug 13, 2008
Messages
619
Yellow grossular garnet, 3.17 cts. This garnet was analyzed by GIA Research, and published in Gems & Gemology, Winter 1991, page 258. It was measured by EDXRF spectroscopy. The cause of the color is unusual. It is due to Mn2+ in distorted cubic position, with no significant contribution from iron. R.I.=1.738.

5ygross317.jpg
 

zeolite

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Aug 13, 2008
Messages
619
Yellow garnet, 0.97cts. This garnet identity is as yet unknown. It could be grossular-andradite, but may be pyrope-spessartite, as in the example in Gems & Gemology, Winter 2011. R.I.=1.781.

6pyspess097.jpg
 

zeolite

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Aug 13, 2008
Messages
619
Spessartite garnet, 2.05 cts, from Pakistan. R.I.=O.L. (over the measuring limit of the refractometer, above 1.800).

8spess205.jpg
 

zeolite

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Aug 13, 2008
Messages
619
Orange grossular garnet, 6.11 cts. Absolutely every orange grossular garnet I have ever seen, has a very strong brown component in its orange color. I can’t get the hue or intensity right in these pictures. It is closer to pure orange (less red) than both pictures, and is much brighter.

9gross611.jpg
 

zeolite

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Aug 13, 2008
Messages
619
In the second, more intense lighting picture, the intensity on the right side of that picture, is still very much lower than the actual gem. Its intensity of color is every bit equal to the finest spessartite, and is far beyond what my camera and maximum Photoshop saturation can produce. R.I.=1.738.

10gross611.jpg
 

zeolite

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Aug 13, 2008
Messages
619
Pastel pink pyrope, 2.47 cts. This is the palest pyrope garnet I have. R.I.=1.732.

11pyrope247.jpg
 

zeolite

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Aug 13, 2008
Messages
619
Pink-orange (padparadscha color) garnet, 1.75 cts. This was sold as Imperial garnet, from Lindi, Tanzania (southeast Tanzania, near the Indian Ocean coast). It appears to be a malaya garnet (pyrope-spessartite) but with high pyrope content. It is one of my palest bright garnets, and is quite rare. R.I.=1.751.

12malaya175.jpg
 

zeolite

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Aug 13, 2008
Messages
619
Pink pyrope, 4.66 cts. This gem was marketed as Umbalight, meaning a pastel garnet, from the Umba river area of northeast Tanzania. The extremely low R.I.=1.732, indicates that it is near pure pyrope, not high enough to be classified as rhodolite.

13umbalight465.jpg
 

zeolite

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Aug 13, 2008
Messages
619
Rhodolite heart, 2.25 cts. Unusually brilliant for rhodolite.

14pyal2.25.jpg
 

zeolite

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Aug 13, 2008
Messages
619
Chrome pyrope, 1.08 cts. Anthill pyrope from Arizona. R.I.=1.732. Has been mistaken by ruby specialists as ruby.

15Pygarn108.jpg
 

zeolite

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Aug 13, 2008
Messages
619
Purplish-red chrome pyrope, 1.06 cts. Anthill pyrope from Arizona. I have never see this color, before or since. R.I.=1.731.

16purPyGarn106.jpg
 

zeolite

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Aug 13, 2008
Messages
619
Color change garnet, pyrope-spessartite, 0.71 cts. This garnet, from Bekily, Madagascar, was photographed with a daylight fluorescent on one side, and at the same time, a G.E. Reveal incandescent light bulb on the other side. Most CC garnets with good color change, are excessively dark. This garnet is not at all dark. It only appears that way in the picture, because the lighting was angled to only reflect off of the bottom two facets, to show both colors without light mixing. It is extremely unusual to have a garnet with the daylight color as strong in intensity as the incandescent color. Many CC garnets can have a strong pink or red incandescent color, but then a very weak near colorless green in daylight. R.I.=1.761.

17ccBekily071.jpg
 

minousbijoux

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Aug 5, 2010
Messages
12,688
Excellent information Zeo! Fantastic photos. How many of the garnets in the study were yours? What sets all of these aside is that they seem so pure of hue with good saturation. I have never seen a pure orange stone that was not a spessartite, never seen an almost colorless garnet, and definitely never seen such a saturated yellow garnet. Truly beautiful.

Now must get my subscription renenwed. I have been trying to save every little penny, but I can't resist one little old subscription.

P.S. Weren't you helping out with an engagement ring a while ago? How is that going?
 

Treenbean

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Feb 25, 2010
Messages
798
Wow Zeolite, This is such great information! Do they know why or how the distortion of the crystal structure occurred in the grossular garnet? Is it just the conditions in which it grows?
 

zeolite

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Aug 13, 2008
Messages
619
Thank you for your kind comments. None of the garnets in the study were mine. They were part of the GIA permanent collection.

My intense orange grossular needs to be studied by GIA Research. I’ve never seen another orange grossular like that, including 24 years of Tucson gems shows.

I have all but 3 Gems & Gemology issues for the last 30 years. A rather expensive but educational library. If anyone wonders where I get my scientific gem knowledge (beside my physics and gemology degrees), it is from carefully reading the very accurate chemical and optical articles published by GIA Research over the many years, and having the scientific background to easily understand them.

The bride to be was presented with 4 red gems to choose from (the red spinel pictured here, plus another red spinel, a red garnet, and a small, incredibly saturated, yet brilliant hot pink sapphire). She picked the sapphire, got it mounted, and returned to Taipei before I could get a picture of it. When she comes here again, I’ll get a good picture.
 

zeolite

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Aug 13, 2008
Messages
619
Treenbean|1330112573|3133538 said:
Wow Zeolite, This is such great information! Do they know why or how the distortion of the crystal structure occurred in the grossular garnet? Is it just the conditions in which it grows?

They didn't go into detail on that, nor where in the garnet structure the Mn2+ substituted. My uneducated guess is that the Mn2+ substituted for a Ca atom, and slightly changed and distorted the unit cell structure size.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009261407005969

From this link: ...We have studied the luminescence of Ce3+ in garnet phosphors and established a relationship between the excitation/emission wavelengths and the deviation from cubic symmetry around the rare-earth ion.
 

sapphiredream

Shiny_Rock
Joined
Nov 29, 2017
Messages
258
Waow...so nice!

Would you be able to share what have been your sources for the lighter, brighter garnets over the years?
What is the one in your picture profile? THAT is stunning - assuming it looks that vibrant IRL too.
 
Last edited:

minousbijoux

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Aug 5, 2010
Messages
12,688
sapphiredream: I would not hold my breath waiting for a response, as Zeolite, unfortunately, has not posted here for years. It would be so awesome if they returned!
 

foxinsox

Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Jul 18, 2015
Messages
3,920
That’s such a shame. This was a fascinating read.
 
Be a part of the community Get 3 HCA Results
Top