stargurl78
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2010
- Messages
- 3,296
LaurenThePartier said:Stargurl, my first instinct is to say yes it would, but does the 5x5 setting have chevron prongs or traditional prongs? Also, is your cushion considered to be more "pillowy", or does it have straight sides?
Typically, with prong settings, you have a bit of leeway (~.5mm either way), so you should be ok, but if it's a halo or the basket is shaped for a different stone, you may have some issues with seeing around the stone.
Do you have pics of both the stone and the setting?
stargurl78 said:LaurenThePartier said:Stargurl, my first instinct is to say yes it would, but does the 5x5 setting have chevron prongs or traditional prongs? Also, is your cushion considered to be more "pillowy", or does it have straight sides?
Typically, with prong settings, you have a bit of leeway (~.5mm either way), so you should be ok, but if it's a halo or the basket is shaped for a different stone, you may have some issues with seeing around the stone.
Do you have pics of both the stone and the setting?
Lauren, thank you so much for the info. I have attached the links for the stone (last one on the page) and the setting I am considering. But based on what you have said, it sounds like it should work. Let me know what you think:
Stone:
http://www.finewatergems.com/spinel.html
Setting:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=180576691121&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT
Michael_E said:The size of the setting is probably O.K., but how will someone set that stone with four round prongs? A cushion cut like that either needs to have chevron prongs, which can be slightly flattened to match the angles of the cushion, OR it needs to have double prongs at the corners. Trying to use one round prong at each corner concentrates all of stresses that the stone sees directly at the weakest part of the stone. By using double prongs or a flattened chevron, you spread out those stresses and reduce the chances of damaging your stone, should it get banged against something.