Why does a AGS 000 come up HCA 3??

[ryebread]

So Im looking at this AGS 000 I SI2 (110% eyeclean) diamond whick looks to be great. But when I put it into HCA it comes up 3. Can someone explain this or what it is with this diamond?
http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/4044/

 

[strmrdr]

33.98 id round too 34 for the hca

Selected: 60.7% depth, 57.7% table, 34° crown angle, 41° pavilion angle
The result is for a symmetrical diamond with a medium girdle and very good polish
HCA scores were adjusted Dec. 15, 2001 and Feb. 6, 2003.


Factor Grade
Light Return Excellent
Fire Excellent
Scintillation Very Good
Spread
or diameter for weight Very Good
Total Visual Performance 1.4 - Excellent
within TIC range

 

[strmrdr]

rounding down doesnt change the sscore much in this case.

Selected: 60.7% depth, 57.6% table, 33.9° crown angle, 41° pavilion angle
The result is for a symmetrical diamond with a medium girdle and very good polish
HCA scores were adjusted Dec. 15, 2001 and Feb. 6, 2003.


Factor Grade
Light Return Excellent
Fire Excellent
Scintillation Very Good
Spread
or diameter for weight Very Good

Total Visual Performance 1.3 - Excellent
within TIC range

 

[strmrdr]

My quess is that you entered the wrong number for the pavilion.

 

[Cleo]

Hey there

I''m not sure why you got this result - I put the figures in and came up with an HCA score of 1.3 (Excellent) with Ex, Ex, Vg, Vg.

Are you sure you input the % figures for the diamond?

x x x

 

[strmrdr]

looking over the rest of the data as long as its eyeclean its a diamond id buy in a heartbeat.
I love I si eyeclean super-ideal rounds.
Do you have it on hold? You might want too so it dont get snagged its a very popular combo.