agreeDate: 1/22/2009 12:34:50 AM
Author:
I like the POH, but as far as princesses, definitely #2
Hey boondax,Date: 1/22/2009 12:45:48 AM
Author: Boondax
Just a quick thought...in that video, #2 seems to be the best performer. However, the GemEx Light Performance Report says otherwise. Is it common that what the eyes see and what the reports say conflict?
I'm looking to purchase a diamond next week. I'd like to have it set in a whiteflash setting. What is the best way to go about this? Have GOG ship the diamond to me and send it to whiteflash? What about the insurance recommendation by whiteflash? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!
A pleasure to serve. Sarah enjoys giving her dad orders for a change.Date: 1/22/2009 8:40:56 AM
Author: Boondax
Rhino, a VERY BIG THANKS to you and Sarah for putting that video together.
There are times in my videos where I just can''t help but give my opinion on my favorite but when I am recording a bunch of stones with rare optics I like to let my clients pick what grab their eyes most in the clips. It has been our experience that those picked visually by them is what they would also pick live and some folks prefer slight nuances in one over another at times that we are able to capture in our hi def recording. We experiemented in the store with this and folks even here on the forum have flown to us from Canada to make the same correlation only to choose what they did the vid too. When the choice is clear, I''m happy to say so but when its close and you''ve watched enough of our clips you get to learn what you do and don''t like most and the key to helping people efficiently & effectively is learning their likes and dislikes.Could I ask what your favorite is? If you''re not comfortable posting it here, could you email it to me? I''ll reply to your email to make it a little easier. There''s so much work in searching for a diamond, but it seems to be well worth it.
This is precisely what I''m talking about dax. I am a big fan of H&A Squares but what I may prefer may not be what you, or more importantly *she* may prefer and she''s the one who will be doing your cooking.There''s so much work in searching for a diamond, but it seems to be well worth it. I really want to go with the PoH, but when I showed my girlfriend the video, she was really like one of the princess cuts. Initially, the PoH was her choice, but after seeing the video, she seems to prefer the smaller sparkles of the princess rather than the broader flashes of the PoH. She didn''t know she was looking at her future diamond haha.
Either that or I can ship it directly to WF on your behalf. Our goal is to make this as simple and painless for you as humanly possible. Let Joanne know how you''d like to proceed and we''re here on standby for you.Regarding the whiteflash setting and your diamond, I think whiteflash''s policy is that they will not send out a setting without a diamond. Does this mean that I have to have the diamond shipped to me and have whiteflash set it for me? I live in the Houston area anyway, so it wouldn''t be a problem if it had to be that way.
Not sure if I''d use the word "more" in this scenario but you''re onto something though. The contrast pattern is definitely different as the darker reflections, particularly in diamond #1 are more pronounced than in #3 but they both have contrast. Diamond #1 shows what is perhaps stronger contrast while #3 less but seemingly lighter/brighter. The flavor that comes from that facility in Ideal Princess Cuts also reflects, to a degree the same thinking with their rounds. Ie. Many of their rounds are cut to 41.0 degree pavilion angles which in the GIA Ex/AGS Ideal realm show less darker reflections (in a critical/practical observation) avoiding moreso head/body reflection. The same is true of their Princess Cuts. You can also see the critical results of what I''m saying (and you''re seeing) via the ASET photography we take. Below is a comparison of the ASET''s between #1 and #3 and you can see the more pronounced blues in #1 with less blues and more reds in #3. Neat eh?Date: 1/24/2009 9:15:02 AM
Author: Ellen
Jon, does the 3rd Princess show a tad more brightness than the other two?
That''s what I seem to see, and probably the one I''d pick out of the Princess. But my first pick would be the POH, I just prefer that look, but that''s totally personal. No matter what you pick, you can''t go wrong!
Yes! And the contrast pattern is indeed different.Date: 1/24/2009 2:06:08 PM
Author: Rhino
Not sure if I''d use the word ''more'' in this scenario but you''re onto something though. The contrast pattern is definitely different as the darker reflections, particularly in diamond #1 are more pronounced than in #3 but they both have contrast. Diamond #1 shows what is perhaps stronger contrast while #3 less but seemingly lighter/brighter. The flavor that comes from that facility in Ideal Princess Cuts also reflects, to a degree the same thinking with their rounds. Ie. Many of their rounds are cut to 41.0 degree pavilion angles which in the GIA Ex/AGS Ideal realm show less darker reflections (in a critical/practical observation) avoiding moreso head/body reflection. The same is true of their Princess Cuts. You can also see the critical results of what I''m saying (and you''re seeing) via the ASET photography we take. Below is a comparison of the ASET''s between #1 and #3 and you can see the more pronounced blues in #1 with less blues and more reds in #3. Neat eh?Date: 1/24/2009 9:15:02 AM
Author: Ellen
Jon, does the 3rd Princess show a tad more brightness than the other two?
That''s what I seem to see, and probably the one I''d pick out of the Princess. But my first pick would be the POH, I just prefer that look, but that''s totally personal. No matter what you pick, you can''t go wrong!