What''s the difference between these?

[met]

http://www.bluenile.com/round-diamond-2-carat-ideal-cut-g-color-vs1-clarity_LD01460256


http://www.bluenile.com/round-diamond-2-carat-ideal-cut-g-color-vs1-clarity_LD01476383?__fun_frm=i&filter_id=0



http://www.bluenile.com/round-diamond-2-carat-ideal-cut-g-color-vs1-clarity_LD01200668?__fun_frm=i&filter_id=0



The 1st one is the cheapest, but the numbers on it is all good?

Thanks for your expertise.

 

[stone-cold11]

No idea of #2, but #1 is better cut than #3 from the numbers. Not sure why it is still cheaper than #3, but there are other factors affecting the pricing of the stone.

 

[Ellen]

Date: 8/22/2009 2:42:02 PM
Author: Stone-cold11
No idea of #2, but #1 is better cut than #3 from the numbers. Not sure why it is still cheaper than #3, but there are other factors affecting the pricing of the stone.

Ditto.

If you wanted a bit safer stone, here''s one. Just under the majic number, so it saves you some, but has the face up size of a 2 ct.

http://www.bluenile.com/round-diamond-1-carat-signature-ideal-cut-g-color-vs2-clarity_LD01281860?__fun_frm=i&filter_id=0#grading_report


Or, if you wanted one where you have more info, here''s one, just a hair smaller.

http://goodoldgold.com/diamond/6123/

 

[Lorelei]

Date: 8/22/2009 3:57:08 PM
Author: Ellen

Date: 8/22/2009 2:42:02 PM
Author: Stone-cold11
No idea of #2, but #1 is better cut than #3 from the numbers. Not sure why it is still cheaper than #3, but there are other factors affecting the pricing of the stone.

Ditto.

If you wanted a bit safer stone, here''s one. Just under the majic number, so it saves you some, but has the face up size of a 2 ct.

http://www.bluenile.com/round-diamond-1-carat-signature-ideal-cut-g-color-vs2-clarity_LD01281860?__fun_frm=i&filter_id=0#grading_report


Or, if you wanted one where you have more info, here''s one, just a hair smaller.

http://goodoldgold.com/diamond/6123/

Nice choices Miss!