Date: 8/18/2007 11:06:20 AM
Author: sparkles
Lets say pear cut excellent
Dee*Jay - your not helping my hypothetical situation. You switched sides but your still rooting for the ''other team''.
Date: 8/18/2007 11:21:30 AM
Author: sparkles
Hahahaha Dee*Jay. You get the wooden spoon award for throwing the cat amongst the pigeons. I do you think you are stirring me up!
Ditto. Except I'd go to three on a roundDate: 8/18/2007 4:13:32 PM
Author: diamondseeker2006
I'd never wear a round over 2 cts. The only stones that I'd want over 3 cts. would be cushion, emerald, or asscher.
Me too! But I voted for the pear because I do not want a round, especially that big.Date: 8/18/2007 11:11:58 AM
Author: ayala_jessica
I know it will not help you but I would buy a beautiful E or F VS1 asscher....![]()
Ditto. Over 3 cts, I''d prefer an emerald cut, or perhaps an asscher.Date: 8/18/2007 4:13:32 PM
Author: diamondseeker2006
I voted for the round hyposthetically because I think over the long run Id be happier with a round over a pear. However, realistically I''d never wear a round over 2 cts. The only stones that I''d want over 3 cts. would be cushion, emerald, or asscher.
Well I knew this was hypothetical for US--as, presumably, none of us are currently looking to spend $40k on a stone--but you never said it was hypothetical for you until now. Thanks for clarifying, I now understand the thread!Date: 8/18/2007 11:12:34 AM
Author: sparkles
Musey, this is hypotheticalsince I already own a 3.27ct HSi2 pear. I do however love the sparkle of RBs and well cut pears are a pain in the backside to try and find.![]()