The crown and pavilion angles have the greatest impact on light performance/ sparkle, - this article from GOG goes into detail concerning the LFG's and their importance.Date: 1/9/2009 12:03:21 PM
Author: zeiss
Ellen, thanks for the link!
Does it means that given 2 stones with the same ideal crown/pavillion angles, a stone with longer lower girdle facet will be more sparky?
Zeiss
Along with Lorelei''s links, there''s a video on this page that may help. I can''t copy it seperately, so way down the page (about 3/4) is a video that says,Date: 1/9/2009 12:03:21 PM
Author: zeiss
Ellen, thanks for the link!
Does it means that given 2 stones with the same ideal crown/pavillion angles, a stone with longer lower girdle facet will be more sparky?
Zeiss
Most very well cut stones tend to fall in the range of 75-80. However, don''t get too hung up on them. The cutter of the stone cuts what''s appropriate for a particular stone. Just concentrate on the overall cut of the stone, that''s most important.Date: 1/9/2009 1:02:22 PM
Author: zeiss
Thanks for the links.
Is there an ''ideal range'' for the lower girdle length?
Thanks!
Ditto Miss Ellen!Date: 1/9/2009 1:07:28 PM
Author: Ellen
Most very well cut stones tend to fall in the range of 75-80. However, don''t get too hung up on them. The cutter of the stone cuts what''s appropriate for a particular stone. Just concentrate on the overall cut of the stone, that''s most important.Date: 1/9/2009 1:02:22 PM
Author: zeiss
Thanks for the links.
Is there an ''ideal range'' for the lower girdle length?
Thanks!
To you maybe.Date: 1/9/2009 3:54:31 PM
Author: zeiss
Correct me if I'm wrong. By watching the GOG video that Ms Ellen posted earlier, it seems to me that the stone with longer LGF length is a clear winner over the one with 75% LGF length?
Thanks!