VS2 "Chip" would you be concerned?

[clearfading]

Would you be concerned if the clarity characteristics on the GIA report for a VS2 said chip on it, among other less concerning clarity concerns. Would this be a durability concern or is it too small at that level?

 

[John P]

Would you be concerned if the clarity characteristics on the GIA report for a VS2 said chip on it, among other less concerning clarity concerns. Would this be a durability concern or is it too small at that level?

At VS2 it's most likely not a durability issue, but its significance depends on collective details. Is it the grade-setter (listed first)? What's the size and nature? Does it occur at a facet-junction? Etc.

 

[clearfading]

GIA 1166694033. If you go to download PDF the whole stone comes up with the plotting. Personally I can't discern what is what and where on the stone for the most part by their markings. That's where you experts come in Thanks

 

[iwantsparkle]

Not an expert, but it would not bother me in this case.

 

[John P]

GIA 1166694033. If you go to download PDF the whole stone comes up with the plotting. Personally I can't discern what is what and where on the stone for the most part by their markings. That's where you experts come in Thanks

Based on plot-examination: The graders judged the chips to have minor influence.

The most noteworthy characteristic is the cloud cluster under the table. At VS2 these should not be an issue. The pavilion-side feather and crystal in the center of the table are next in significance. There are two chips at the girdle near 8:00, a tiny needle near the clouds, a natural at 4:30 and several extra facets.


Speculation: The extra facets, culet and girdle details are indicators of older fashioning (although it was nicely shaped to be very round). It's conceivable that this diamond has been in circulation for many years, now with a report issued in 2014. In such a case those little chips may be simple wear and tear. They have been judged benign. Nevertheless, it would be useful to ask an expert if they occur in a place where the girdle is judged to run to very thin, as a point of information.

In the macro: Even a flawless diamond can get chipped if it takes a knock the wrong way. That's the reason I encourage diamond lovers to insure their jewelry if they intend to wear it, just as they insure their cars.

 

[clearfading]

That was very, very helpful! Thanks!!

 

[John P]

That was very, very helpful! Thanks!!

You're welcome. Enjoy.