lisamarie
Shiny_Rock
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2008
- Messages
- 256
so...tiffany attaches a pretty large premium on their rings so if you're trying to get more for your money, it's not really the way to go. i've been obsessed with the square h&a for a long time now, but i've read that the square h&a faces up smaller than the novo. so, in the end, would it still be more cost effective if you had to go up in size on the square h&a to match the spread on the novo?
also, is it just me or is the novo more cushiony while the square h&a is more square? are the sides of the square h&a more straight in comparison?
lastly, and most importantly, would a square h&a generally be more sparkly than a novo? i know the square h&a is cut based on very precise standards but i'm also assuming that tiffany is very selective in choosing stones. would i get an more bling from a square h&a? obviously, i would never get a chance to see them side by side.
thanks for listening to me ramble!
also, is it just me or is the novo more cushiony while the square h&a is more square? are the sides of the square h&a more straight in comparison?
lastly, and most importantly, would a square h&a generally be more sparkly than a novo? i know the square h&a is cut based on very precise standards but i'm also assuming that tiffany is very selective in choosing stones. would i get an more bling from a square h&a? obviously, i would never get a chance to see them side by side.
thanks for listening to me ramble!
