anastomosis
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2010
- Messages
- 11
Hello, I am a newb.. I wanted some opinion regarding these two stones that I am interested in.
0.70 E color, VS1, Blue Nile Signature Ideal
GIA triple excellent, no fluorescence
Table: 56%, Depth: 60.8%, Crown: 34 degrees, Pavillion: 40.8
Thin to medium faceted.
5.76 x 5.79 x 3.51
$3655
I currently have this stone and it is very pretty, no complaints, but I am thinking of trading it in for a
0.70 D color, VS1
GIA triple excellent, no fluorescence
Table: 57, Depth: 60.3, Crown: 34, Pavillion 40.8
Thin to medium faceted
5.76 x 5.79 x 3.51
$3657
Iam pretty sure the 1st stone has a slight markup because of the signature ideal cut, but I just think the 2nd stone is better deal and just as good as the signature ideal without the markup. Am I right to assume this? Is the signature ideal worth the approximately $300-400 markup that I could be spending on an increase in color? In addition, I liked the table at 56%, do you guys think that a 57% table is slightly large for the proportions. Thanks in advance
0.70 E color, VS1, Blue Nile Signature Ideal
GIA triple excellent, no fluorescence
Table: 56%, Depth: 60.8%, Crown: 34 degrees, Pavillion: 40.8
Thin to medium faceted.
5.76 x 5.79 x 3.51
$3655
I currently have this stone and it is very pretty, no complaints, but I am thinking of trading it in for a
0.70 D color, VS1
GIA triple excellent, no fluorescence
Table: 57, Depth: 60.3, Crown: 34, Pavillion 40.8
Thin to medium faceted
5.76 x 5.79 x 3.51
$3657
Iam pretty sure the 1st stone has a slight markup because of the signature ideal cut, but I just think the 2nd stone is better deal and just as good as the signature ideal without the markup. Am I right to assume this? Is the signature ideal worth the approximately $300-400 markup that I could be spending on an increase in color? In addition, I liked the table at 56%, do you guys think that a 57% table is slightly large for the proportions. Thanks in advance