Table Question

[bigterpsfan]

Any concern with 54% table? I really liked the way the diamond looked in person, but I am a noob and want to make sure the specs on this diamond are "perfect." I know they aren't perfect in color or clarity, but I am am talking about the rest of the diamond. In addition, I realize that a total depth of 61.2 is Great, but not perfect, so ignore that.



GIA Lab Report - June 30, 2010

Shape - Round Brilliant
Carat weight - 1.37
Color - E
Cut - Excellent
Clarity - VS1
Polish - Excellent
Symmetry - Excellent
Flourescence - Faint
Table - 54%
Depth - 61.2%
Crown Angle - 34%
Crown Depth - 15.5%
Stars - 50%
Lower half - 80%
Pavilion Angle - 40.8%
Pavlion Depth- 43.0%
Girdle - Thin to Medium (2.5%)
Cutlet - None
Diameter - 7.19mm-7.23mm x 4.41mm

 

[Andelain]

Any concern with 54% table? I really liked the way the diamond looked in person, but I am a noob and want to make sure the specs on this diamond are "perfect." I know they aren't perfect in color or clarity, but I am am talking about the rest of the diamond. In addition, I realize that a total depth of 61.2 is Great, but not perfect, so ignore that.



GIA Lab Report - June 30, 2010

Shape - Round Brilliant
Carat weight - 1.37
Color - E
Cut - Excellent
Clarity - VS1
Polish - Excellent
Symmetry - Excellent
Flourescence - Faint
Table - 54%
Depth - 61.2%
Crown Angle - 34%
Crown Depth - 15.5%
Stars - 50%
Lower half - 80%
Pavilion Angle - 40.8%
Pavlion Depth- 43.0%
Girdle - Thin to Medium (2.5%)
Cutlet - None
Diameter - 7.19mm-7.23mm x 4.41mm

Actually the numbers, including the depth, on this stone are damn near perfect. And the color and clarity are fantastic. Can you get an Ideal Scope image from the vendor? I think you may have found a winner here.

 

[bigterpsfan]

Thanks. I will see if I can get that from the jewler.

 

[MichelleCarmen]

The color and clarity (IMO) are perfect!