rate this cushion

[pepperell]

is there anything to be wary of given this stone''s stats?

brilliant cushion

weight: 1.78 c
meas: 7.68 x 6.80 x 4.75 mm
depth: 69.9%
table: 55%
girdle: medium to thick faceted
cutlet: small
finish: polish ex symmetry ex
clarity: VS1
color: G
fluor: none

 

[Garry H (Cut Nut)]

Nothing ''wrong'' - but table and depth % do not tell you much - read the 60 60 page in the tutorial

who graded it?

 

[Orange]

The depth is a little high, so you might be sacrificing a bit of spread here.

 

[valeria101]

Should be nice - I would be surprised if it wasn't. Of course those numbers can also belong to an ugly shard... but chances are this glass is more full than empty, IMO. Can you get a picture ?

On the other hand, well... this is not the largest 1.8cts cushion. The ex-ex finish grades most likely bring a premium although they do not make much of a difference, if any.

Picture and price quote would be really, really useful before "rating" this particular deal

A diamond listed for about 13.5k matches those specs... sure it is a fine cut, but THIS GUY is quite a bit larger and 1k cheaper. Since the numbers do not tell if one if more brilliant or better looking in any other way than the other, these two come in direct competition, as far as I can tell.