Radiant table and depth

[sklingem]

Hi guys,
still in search of that radiant. Despite the fact that one really should see the stone (especially for fancy cuts) and not rely on specs only, are there any table/depth values that you would not consider in the first place?? I found one with a table of 55% and depth of 60%, not sure if I should order it to have a look. Any input?
Thanks again!
S.

 

[coda72]

This should help.

http://www.gemappraisers.com/oldcutgraderules.asp

 

[oldminer]

You have found an unusual cut for a radiant. While you can use the AGA Cut Class grades for this shape, I would strongly advise you to look at the diamond. It may be just fine or very strange. It is not near the norm of most radiants which tend toward deeper and with wider tables.

 

[sklingem]

Yeah, this is quite unusual. Not sure if the size influences that? (7.36x5.22mm)