I was thinking the side stones looked a little bigger as well. I like them though, but I was worried that the center diamond would look tiny. I''m looking for a round a 1.14-1.15, so hopefully it will work.
It is at Verragio getting set, but I''m not sure when I''ll be getting it once it''s back to SB anyway. I went with the princess instead of the radiant since I heard (from here) how hard it is to find a quality radiant. I figured my chances were better with a Princess. But I did look at radiants while I was there. They were so pretty, but I was very surprised at how much smaller they looked than princesses. I looked at a 1.20 radiant that looked much smaller that a 1.14 princess right next to it. I will def. post pictures when I get it. 
Date: 11/18/2009 8:56:18 PM
Author: amyholder
noob2010. I''m sorry, I wasn''t ignoring you. For some reason I don''t receive notifications when someone replies. My apologies. I haven''t gotten this ring yet
Another strange note is that when I go to Verragio''s website and click on the 7005 now, it has changed. It use to have 6 little diamonds going down the side and now it shows 5 diamonds instead. Same total carat weight though. Very strange. I had the original 7005 pic saved on my computer, and my jeweler assured me that he ordered me the one with 6 smaller diamonds on each side instead of 5 slightly larger diamonds on each side....
Noob- I''m so excited to hear that you are getting the 7005 as well! I searched on-line forever for anyone IRL, and I couldn''t find anyone that has the ring. I was getting worried since it doesn''t seem to be a popular ring. I would love to see pics when you get it. I have a feeling mine is going to be a little while. I would also be interested in what you''re going to do about a WB. I''m torn. I was thinking the matching one from Verragio, a small plain WG band or maybe even a bank with alternating colors with the diamonds (pink or aqua). I tried on both the 5 stone and 6 stone on each side of the Verragio. I liked the 6 stone much better. More dainty.....Glad to see there is someone else out there that likes the ring!!!Date: 12/9/2009 10:07:27 PM
Author: noob2010
Date: 11/18/2009 8:56:18 PM
Author: amyholder
noob2010. I''m sorry, I wasn''t ignoring you. For some reason I don''t receive notifications when someone replies. My apologies. I haven''t gotten this ring yet
Another strange note is that when I go to Verragio''s website and click on the 7005 now, it has changed. It use to have 6 little diamonds going down the side and now it shows 5 diamonds instead. Same total carat weight though. Very strange. I had the original 7005 pic saved on my computer, and my jeweler assured me that he ordered me the one with 6 smaller diamonds on each side instead of 5 slightly larger diamonds on each side....
Hey amyholder, no worries. The email notification doesn''t work for me either so I can''t keep track of half the posts I reply to.
Anyhow, I ended getting the 7005 also. I was told by the vendor that there would be 6 stones on each side, but wouldn''t mind 5 larger stones either. I''m going to contact verragio to see what they have to say.
Yes, the 5 stones were larger than the one with 6 stones. That''s why I liked it better. I thought the smaller diamonds on the band were daintier (is that a word) and more feminine than the 5 larger stones. I hope she loves it. I''m not sure when I''m getting mine though. He hasn''t really said other than the fact that SB called and said it was back from Verragio. What diamond did you end up getting? We picked out a princess. I believe it is a 1.15 E colored........Date: 12/18/2009 12:44:58 PM
Author: noob2010
Amy, did you notice if the stones on the band with 5 were actually larger than the one with 6?
I''ll definitely post pics once I get it... probably won''t be for another month though. When do you plan on getting yours?
As far as the band goes, I''ll let her decide
300x240.png)
