RLG
Shiny_Rock
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2007
- Messages
- 316
I got my appraisal on Friday and a couple of questions are just nagging at me. She appraised my engagement ring for $500 dollars more than we paid for it, but I felt like she had bias against the stone given it was bought on the internet. She mentioned that once she knew that we had bought the stone over the internet she had to keep that in mind when placing a value. Is it common to practice to factor in where the stone was bought in the appraisal price? Is a stone bought in a B&M appraised for more? I was not looking for an overly inflated appraisal price, but just wondering on the effect of the internet into the appraisal process. My second question is about another piece of jewelry that I had the appraiser look at. It is a cartier piece that I purchased from signed pieces, so it is gently used. Despite the fact that she mentioned to insure it for the price of a new piece, the bottom of her report that she puts in a statement that reads “At this time, similar Cartier Trinity ring sets are currently advertised in very good condition on selective internet sites in the $1,500 range although their authenticity has not been verified first hand by the appraiser.” Is this common practice? I would think that her job would be limited to looking at the pieces in brought into her and not commenting on other pieces in the market. Also do people commonly provide receipts when they have pieces appraised? So tell me do I have appraiser naivety or is this just odd? Thanks for reading through that long post.