Hello all!
My beautiful girlfriend loves emerald cut diamonds and has said that would be her choice for an engagement ring. Not surprisingly, her tastes are classic and understated.
I have gone back and forth about the ring style and setting. She has tiny hands and fingers (I am guessing her ring size is about 3.5) and she usually just wears a watch and maybe a bracelet and no other rings.
I absolutely love this Evelyn setting but worry that an emerald cut diamond will look a little dull in comparison to all the round sidestones:
http://www.victorcanera.com/jewelry/engagement-rings/the-evelyn-solitaire-with-2ct-emerald-cut
Has this been your experience? I have read that an emerald does not sparkle as much as rounds when viewed in comparison and it is hard to find emerald cuts at brick and mortar stores to get a sense of how this might look. Would I be better off with just plain platinum band and 4 prong setting with the emerald cut? This would allow me to go a little bigger/better with the diamond.
For budgeting-- I am comfortable buying from JA and can afford a 1.70 carat or so G/VS1 which seem to be around the 14k mark. I can stretch my budget to about 18k if the ring is exactly what I am looking for. I am assuming if I wanted to buy the Evelyn setting with a 1.7 carat from Victor Canera it would be substantially higher than my budget would allow. If I bought both the diamond and setting from JA do they have a setting close to the VC setting? I have seen bezel sidestones and other settings but I really do not like their looks. So I have narrowed my choice to either an emerald solitaire in platinum or one with small round sidestones.
So-- to sum up my main question-- does an emerald cut look "good" with small round sidestones or is it better off all alone? I fully understand this is a subjective answer but I am looking for some help and advice.
Thanks everyone!
My beautiful girlfriend loves emerald cut diamonds and has said that would be her choice for an engagement ring. Not surprisingly, her tastes are classic and understated.
I have gone back and forth about the ring style and setting. She has tiny hands and fingers (I am guessing her ring size is about 3.5) and she usually just wears a watch and maybe a bracelet and no other rings.
I absolutely love this Evelyn setting but worry that an emerald cut diamond will look a little dull in comparison to all the round sidestones:
http://www.victorcanera.com/jewelry/engagement-rings/the-evelyn-solitaire-with-2ct-emerald-cut
Has this been your experience? I have read that an emerald does not sparkle as much as rounds when viewed in comparison and it is hard to find emerald cuts at brick and mortar stores to get a sense of how this might look. Would I be better off with just plain platinum band and 4 prong setting with the emerald cut? This would allow me to go a little bigger/better with the diamond.
For budgeting-- I am comfortable buying from JA and can afford a 1.70 carat or so G/VS1 which seem to be around the 14k mark. I can stretch my budget to about 18k if the ring is exactly what I am looking for. I am assuming if I wanted to buy the Evelyn setting with a 1.7 carat from Victor Canera it would be substantially higher than my budget would allow. If I bought both the diamond and setting from JA do they have a setting close to the VC setting? I have seen bezel sidestones and other settings but I really do not like their looks. So I have narrowed my choice to either an emerald solitaire in platinum or one with small round sidestones.
So-- to sum up my main question-- does an emerald cut look "good" with small round sidestones or is it better off all alone? I fully understand this is a subjective answer but I am looking for some help and advice.
Thanks everyone!