Hi all,
This is my first post here. Please forgive me if I posted in the wrong section of the forum.
I am starting to research engagement rings which I plan to buy within the next half a year or so.
I am fairly knowledgeable about diamonds.
I do not mean to pose the classic debate of Tiffany vs. Non Tiffany. I understand that the stone itself could be acquired at a much better deal elsewhere; especially that I have many jeweler friends.
What I am primarily concerned about it the setting. I set my eye on one of Tiffanys halo rings. I feel like no matter who I turn to, such design of the setting can not be properly replicated. If I were interested in getting a plain solitaire I would without a doubt skip on tiffanys and get a bigger stone. But with such a convoluted setting I am not sure what to do.
What is your opinion about this? Thanks in advance!
This is my first post here. Please forgive me if I posted in the wrong section of the forum.
I am starting to research engagement rings which I plan to buy within the next half a year or so.
I am fairly knowledgeable about diamonds.
I do not mean to pose the classic debate of Tiffany vs. Non Tiffany. I understand that the stone itself could be acquired at a much better deal elsewhere; especially that I have many jeweler friends.
What I am primarily concerned about it the setting. I set my eye on one of Tiffanys halo rings. I feel like no matter who I turn to, such design of the setting can not be properly replicated. If I were interested in getting a plain solitaire I would without a doubt skip on tiffanys and get a bigger stone. But with such a convoluted setting I am not sure what to do.
What is your opinion about this? Thanks in advance!