PrincessNatalie
Shiny_Rock
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2010
- Messages
- 382
SweetPea-<3 said:Wow! I'm surprised how many LIW are planning to create/sign them. I thought they were still pretty uncommon. I totally get the rationale for protecting yourself, but my heart aches when I think of preparing for divorce even before we get married. BF and I are both financially stable and responsible, neither of us owns a home or car (thanks NYC!), neither of us comes from a wealthy family and we make about the same salary. Perhaps if things were more imbalanced, I'd feel differently.
SweetPea-<3 said:Wow! I'm surprised how many LIW are planning to create/sign them. I thought they were still pretty uncommon. I totally get the rationale for protecting yourself, but my heart aches when I think of preparing for divorce even before we get married. BF and I are both financially stable and responsible, neither of us owns a home or car (thanks NYC!), neither of us comes from a wealthy family and we make about the same salary. Perhaps if things were more imbalanced, I'd feel differently.
AdanaEsq said:SweetPea-<3 said:Wow! I'm surprised how many LIW are planning to create/sign them. I thought they were still pretty uncommon. I totally get the rationale for protecting yourself, but my heart aches when I think of preparing for divorce even before we get married. BF and I are both financially stable and responsible, neither of us owns a home or car (thanks NYC!), neither of us comes from a wealthy family and we make about the same salary. Perhaps if things were more imbalanced, I'd feel differently.
I don't really think of it as preparing for divorce. I mean if you never get divorced then it won't ever matter. A family law attorney once described it as planning for the future while you can think rationally. I mean if somehow things didn't work out, you're less likely to be rational about the division of assets at that point than now. If I had substantial assets or bf wouldn't have a good profession once he finished school then I might have considered it. I also think it may be necessary in our situation to insulate him from my student loans. He owes less than a 1/4 of what I owe. I wouldn't want him to ever be responsible for that.
megumic said:AdanaEsq said:SweetPea-<3 said:Wow! I'm surprised how many LIW are planning to create/sign them. I thought they were still pretty uncommon. I totally get the rationale for protecting yourself, but my heart aches when I think of preparing for divorce even before we get married. BF and I are both financially stable and responsible, neither of us owns a home or car (thanks NYC!), neither of us comes from a wealthy family and we make about the same salary. Perhaps if things were more imbalanced, I'd feel differently.
I don't really think of it as preparing for divorce. I mean if you never get divorced then it won't ever matter. A family law attorney once described it as planning for the future while you can think rationally. I mean if somehow things didn't work out, you're less likely to be rational about the division of assets at that point than now. If I had substantial assets or bf wouldn't have a good profession once he finished school then I might have considered it. I also think it may be necessary in our situation to insulate him from my student loans. He owes less than a 1/4 of what I owe. I wouldn't want him to ever be responsible for that.
Personally, I think that family law attorney was wrong. How can you (the hypothetical you -- male or female) rationally plan right now for your situation at some undetermined potential future divorce?? What if you have kids when the divorce happens, maybe you will want some of that inheritance, or a piece of that business, or whatever it is you signed your rights away to when you agreed to a pre-nup? I just think it is very naive to sign a document that may or may not affect you in the future, especially because you cannot pre-determine the circumstances of your life at the time the document may take effect. So, unless the document protects you (and thus not your spouse)...this would not be my advice.
diamondseeker2006 said:I guess I can understand it for the very wealthy (Tiger Woods situation comes to mind), but I would see it as a HUGE red flag if that came up in any other circumstance. I believe in combined assets once a couple is married, and even if the wife stayed home with the kids for years, she would still deserve half the assets. My understanding from Freke above is that student loan debt would still stay the responsibility of the one who incurred it. That would be my only concern as my daughter has no debt from school and her FF has a ton from grad school.